Usage Score
24.3
Player Dossier
2023-2024Western Michigan
Kenneth Womack
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Upper Marlboro, MD, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Kenneth Womack reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.6
Consistency
81
Season Value
66.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Western Michigan
232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Western Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kenneth Womack, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Western Michigan. Kenneth Womack reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Western Michigan paired 545 primary output with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Western Michigan
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
60.6
Efficiency
83.6
Usage
24.3
Consistency
81
Best Game by takeover score
South Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 89. Marshall: 43. Ball State: 68. Akron: 46. Buffalo: 71. Kent State: 68. Northern Illinois: 51. Bowling Green: 62. Central Michigan: 47
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 5 by 100. Marshall: 6 by 47.8. Ball State: 7 by 64.8. Akron: 4 by 76.7. Buffalo: 3 by 100. Kent State: 2 by 100. Northern Illinois: 4 by 85. Bowling Green: 4 by 100. Central Michigan: 4 by 78.3
Split Comparison
Wins63.3 · n=4 · +4.9 vs Losses
Losses58.4 · n=5 · -4.9 vs Wins
First Half63.4 · n=5 · +6.4 vs Second Half
Second Half57 · n=4 · -6.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Alabama
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Alabama
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/15 | vs South Alabama | L 23-30 | — | 5 | 89 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 39 |
| Wed 11/20 | @ Central Michigan | L 14-16 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Wed 11/13 | @ Bowling Green | L 13-31 | — | 4 | 62 | 13.2 | 15.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Thu 11/7 | vs Northern Illinois | L 28-42 | — | 4 | 51 | 10.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Kent State | W 52-21 | — | 2 | 68 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Buffalo | W 48-41 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Akron | W 34-24 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Ball State | W 45-42 | — | 7 | 68 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Marshall | L 20-27 | — | 6 | 43 | 7.2 | 7.20 | 0 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Western Michigan
2023-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 691 | 61.6 | 29.5 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Western Michigan | 545 | 83.6 | 24.3 | -146 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 545 | 83.6 | 24.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Alabama
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89
Primary metric
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Central Michigan
135
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 75 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kent State
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Bowling Green
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Western Michigan
545 primary output · 83.6 efficiency · 24.3 usage
66.8
#2
2024 Regular Season · Western Michigan
66.8
545 primary · 83.6 efficiency · 24.3 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Western Michigan
63
691 primary · 61.6 efficiency · 29.5 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,236
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.