Usage Score
7.8
Player Dossier
2020-2025TCU
Chase Curtis
TE • 6'5" • 240 lbs • Pittsburg, KS, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Chase Curtis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.7
Consistency
77.2
Season Value
51.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU
20212223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chase Curtis, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU. Chase Curtis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
TCU paired 167 primary output with 80.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · TCU
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
25.7
Efficiency
73.7
Usage
7.8
Consistency
77.2
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 27. UCF: 14. SMU: 36
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 90. UCF: 3 by 31.1. SMU: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Losses25 · n=2
First Half20.5 · n=2
All Games25.7 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
100 vs SMU
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
TCU
2020-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2020202120222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | TCU | 37 | 100 | 3.6 | 37 |
| 2023 Regular Season | TCU | 132 | 47 | 9 | 95 |
| 2024 Regular Season | TCU | 77 | 73.7 | 7.8 | -55 |
| 2025 Postseason | TCU | 167 | 80.7 | 7.5 | 90 |
| 2025 Regular Season | TCU | 167 | 80.7 | 7.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55
Primary metric
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
36
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
37
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Colorado
38
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · TCU
167 primary output · 80.7 efficiency · 7.5 usage
63.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · TCU
63.4
167 primary · 80.7 efficiency · 7.5 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · TCU
51.3
77 primary · 73.7 efficiency · 7.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
413
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 24 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.