Usage Score
9
Player Dossier
2020-2025TCU
TE • 6'5" • 240 lbs • Pittsburg, KS, USA
Chase Curtis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9
Efficiency
47
Consistency
52.1
Season Value
47
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chase Curtis, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU. Chase Curtis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
TCU paired 167 primary output with 80.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 47 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
18.9
Efficiency
47
Usage
9
Consistency
52.1
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Colorado: 15. Houston: 7. SMU: 55. West Virginia: 16. Iowa State: 19. BYU: 0. Kansas State: 20
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Colorado: 2 by 50. Houston: 1 by 46.7. SMU: 2 by 100. West Virginia: 3 by 35.6. Iowa State: 2 by 63.3. BYU: 1 by 0. Kansas State: 4 by 33.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
100 vs SMU
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
TCU
2020-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | TCU | 37 | 100 | 3.6 | 37 |
| 2023 Regular Season | TCU | 132 | 47 | 9 | 95 |
| 2024 Regular Season | TCU | 77 | 73.7 | 7.8 | -55 |
| 2025 Postseason | TCU | 167 | 80.7 | 7.5 | 90 |
| 2025 Regular Season | TCU | 167 | 80.7 | 7.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55
Primary metric
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
36
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
37
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Colorado
38
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · TCU
167 primary output · 80.7 efficiency · 7.5 usage
63.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · TCU
63.4
167 primary · 80.7 efficiency · 7.5 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · TCU
51.3
77 primary · 73.7 efficiency · 7.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
413
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 24 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Chase Curtis quick answers