Usage Score
12.2
Player Dossier
2020-2025Air Force
Micah Davis
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Atlanta, GA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Micah Davis reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
61.8
Consistency
50.9
Season Value
48.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Utah State
20212324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 4
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Air Force • Utah State • Ole Miss • Southern Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Micah Davis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Utah State. Micah Davis reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Utah State paired 628 primary output with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 61.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 4 team stops, with role shifts visible across Air Force, Utah State, Ole Miss, Southern Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Southern Miss
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
35.8
Efficiency
61.8
Usage
12.2
Consistency
50.9
Best Game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 36. Mississippi State: 6. Unknown: 38. App State: 30. Louisiana Tech: 28. Jacksonville State: 34. Georgia Southern: 15. Louisiana: 134. UL Monroe: 1. Arkansas State: 44. Texas State: 4. South Alabama: 59
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 3 by 80. Mississippi State: 2 by 20. Unknown: 3 by 84.4. App State: 3 by 66.7. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 62.2. Jacksonville State: 2 by 100. Georgia Southern: 2 by 50. Louisiana: 3 by 100. UL Monroe: 1 by 6.7. Arkansas State: 5 by 58.7. Texas State: 2 by 13.3. South Alabama: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins43 · n=6 · +16.4 vs Losses
Losses26.6 · n=5 · -16.4 vs Wins
First Half28.7 · n=6 · -14.2 vs Second Half
Second Half42.8 · n=6 · +14.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Alabama
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/23 | vs Western Kentucky | L 16-27 | — | 3 | 36 | 6 | 12 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ South Alabama | L 35-42 | — | 2 | 59 | 29.5 | 29.50 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Texas State | L 14-41 | — | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Arkansas State | W 27-21 | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs UL Monroe | W 49-21 | — | 1 | 1 | 2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Louisiana100 receiving yards | W 22-10 | — | 3 | 134 | 44.7 | 44.70 | 1 | 98 |
| Fri 10/10 | @ Georgia Southern | W 38-35 | — | 2 | 15 | 5.3 | 7.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Jacksonville State | W 42-25 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 20-30 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs App State | W 38-22 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Mississippi State | L 17-34 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Air Force
2020-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Utah State
2023-2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Ole Miss
2024
Peak year stop
- 4
Southern Miss
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2020202120232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Air Force | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Air Force | 221 | 98 | 49.1 | 221 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Utah State | 628 | 86.7 | 16.3 | 407 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 57 | 66.7 | 5.2 | -571 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Utah State | 57 | 66.7 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Southern Miss | 429 | 61.8 | 12.2 | 372 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 429 | 61.8 | 12.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110
Primary metric
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Colorado State
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana
134
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Nevada
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#5
Oklahoma
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Utah State
628 primary output · 86.7 efficiency · 16.3 usage
68.7
#2
2021 Regular Season · Air Force
58.3
221 primary · 98 efficiency · 49.1 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Air Force
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
4
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,335
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.