Usage Score
18.3
Player Profile
Haaziq Daniels
QB • 6'1" • 205 lbs • Franklin, NJ, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Haaziq Daniels is a balanced quarterback profile with 18.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
62.4
Consistency
66.5
Season Value
60
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Air Force
2021212222
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- Air Force
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Air Force
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Haaziq Daniels, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Air Force. Haaziq Daniels is a balanced quarterback profile with 18.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Air Force paired 1,918 primary output with 65.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 62.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Air Force
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
117.8
Efficiency
62.4
Usage
18.3
Consistency
66.5
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 184. Unknown: 216. Colorado: 37. Wyoming: 107. Nevada: 37. Navy: 221. Utah State: 129. UNLV: 24. Boise State: 166. Army: 187. New Mexico: 155. Colorado State: 24. San Diego State: 44
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 22 by 77.8. Unknown: 18 by 84.8. Colorado: 14 by 41.4. Wyoming: 23 by 54.2. Nevada: 10 by 36.6. Navy: 22 by 80.4. Utah State: 22 by 52.1. UNLV: 6 by 58.3. Boise State: 22 by 75. Army: 27 by 60.4. New Mexico: 11 by 100. Colorado State: 11 by 31.7. San Diego State: 13 by 58.9
Split Comparison
Wins101.4 · n=9 · -32.6 vs Losses
Losses134 · n=3 · +32.6 vs Wins
First Half133 · n=7 · +33 vs Second Half
Second Half100 · n=6 · -33 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
100 vs New Mexico
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/23 | vs BaylorDual-threat | W 30-15 | 4 | 7 | 103 | 57.1 | 1 | 0 | 77.8 | 15 | 81 | 5.40 | 1 | 15 |
| Sun 11/27 | @ San Diego State | W 13-3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 58.9 | 11 | 30 | 2.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Colorado State | W 24-12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 31.7 | 9 | 24 | 2.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs New Mexico3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 35-3 | 2 | 2 | 42 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100 | 9 | 113 | 12.60 | 2 | 65 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ ArmyDual-threat | W 13-7 | 6 | 13 | 98 | 46.2 | 0 | 1 | 60.4 | 14 | 89 | 6.40 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Boise StateDual-threat | L 14-19 | 4 | 8 | 96 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 14 | 70 | 5 | 1 | 27 |
| Sun 10/16 | @ UNLV | W 42-7 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 58.3 | 4 | 10 | 2.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Utah State | L 27-34 | 5 | 12 | 95 | 41.7 | 1 | 1 | 52.1 | 10 | 34 | 3.40 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs NavyDual-threat | W 13-10 | 6 | 8 | 156 | 75.0 | 1 | 0 | 80.4 | 14 | 65 | 4.60 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Nevada | W 48-20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 36.6 | 8 | 37 | 4.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Wyoming | L 14-17 | 7 | 14 | 101 | 50.0 | 2 | 0 | 54.2 | 9 | 6 | 0.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Colorado | W 41-10 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 20.0 | 0 | 0 | 41.4 | 9 | 29 | 3.20 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs UnknownDual-threat | — | 3 | 6 | 109 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | 84.8 | 12 | 107 | 8.90 | 1 | 40 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Air Force
2020-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Air Force | 730 | 63.4 | 20 | — |
| 2021 Postseason | Air Force | 1,918 | 65.6 | 20.8 | 1,188 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Air Force | 1,918 | 65.6 | 20.8 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Air Force | 1,531 | 62.4 | 18.3 | -387 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Air Force | 1,531 | 62.4 | 18.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Navy
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
221
Primary metric
221 total offense with 80.4 efficiency.
#2
Louisville
281
Primary metric
Win with 281 yards of offense and 77.3 efficiency.
281 total offense with 77.3 efficiency.
#3
Unknown
216
Primary metric
Game with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
216 total offense with 84.8 efficiency.
#4
Utah State
174
Primary metric
Win with 174 yards of offense and 86.2 efficiency.
174 total offense with 86.2 efficiency.
#5
Army
280
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
280 total offense with 70.2 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Air Force
1,918 primary output · 65.6 efficiency · 20.8 usage
62.5
#2
2021 Regular Season · Air Force
62.5
1,918 primary · 65.6 efficiency · 20.8 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Air Force
60
1,531 primary · 62.4 efficiency · 18.3 usage
Milestones
3
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
18
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
4,179
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.