Usage Score
0.4
Player Dossier
2020-2024Purdue
Ben Furtney
FB • 6'0" • 240 lbs • South Elgin, IL, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Ben Furtney leans balanced backfield option traits and 0 efficiency.
Efficiency
0
Consistency
60
Season Value
20.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Purdue
2021222324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ben Furtney, FB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Purdue. Ben Furtney leans balanced backfield option traits and 0 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Purdue paired 20 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Loss with -5 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 20th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
5
Scrimmage Yards / G
-1
Efficiency
0
Usage
0.4
Consistency
60
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon State: 0. Nebraska: 0. Illinois: 0. Ohio State: -5. Indiana: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Losses-1 · n=5
First Half0 · n=3 · +2.5 vs Second Half
Second Half-2.5 · n=2 · -2.5 vs First Half
All Games-1 · n=5
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
0 vs Ohio State
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2020-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
20202021202220232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Purdue | 20 | 100 | 1.6 | 20 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | 0 | -20 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Purdue | -5 | 0 | 0.4 | -5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Maryland
Win with 20 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
20
Primary metric
20 scrimmage yards and 1.6 usage.
#2
Ohio State
-5
Primary metric
Loss with -5 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
-5 scrimmage yards and 2.1 usage.
#3
Michigan State
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
0 scrimmage yards and 0 usage.
#4
Indiana
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
0 scrimmage yards and 0 usage.
#5
Michigan
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
0 scrimmage yards and 0 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Purdue
20 primary output · 100 efficiency · 1.6 usage
74.2
#2
2021 Regular Season · Purdue
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Purdue
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
15
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.