Usage Score
3.8
Player Dossier
2020-2023Texas A&M
DB • 6'2" • 200 lbs • South Bay, FL, USA
Brian George shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.1 disruption score.
Usage Score
3.8
Efficiency
21.1
Consistency
8.3
Season Value
9.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brian George, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Brian George shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.1 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 0 primary output with 10.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 21.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, Houston.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
21.1
Usage
3.8
Consistency
8.3
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTSA: 0. TCU: 1. Sam Houston: 0. Texas: 0. Kansas State: 0. Cincinnati: 0. Oklahoma State: 0.5. UCF: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 3 by 12.5. TCU: 3 by 22.5. Sam Houston: 3 by 12.5. Texas: 8 by 33.3. Kansas State: 2 by 8.3. Cincinnati: 5 by 20.8. Oklahoma State: 6 by 30. UCF: 7 by 29.2
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
TCU
Best efficiency game
33.3 vs Texas
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2020-2022
Opening stop
Houston
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Texas A&M | 2 | 22.5 | 7.3 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 2 | 22.5 | 7.3 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | 10.4 | 2 | -2 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1 | 9.8 | 1.3 | 1 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Houston | 1.5 | 21.1 | 3.8 | 0.5 |
#1 Featured game
Tennessee
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.8 takeover score.
#2
North Carolina
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.7 takeover score.
#3
TCU
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.5 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 38.4 takeover score.
#5
Oklahoma State
0.5
Primary metric
Loss with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 29.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Texas A&M
0 primary output · 10.4 efficiency · 2 usage
37.5
#2
2020 Postseason · Texas A&M
33.8
2 primary · 22.5 efficiency · 7.3 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Texas A&M
33.8
2 primary · 22.5 efficiency · 7.3 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
60
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Brian George quick answers