Usage Score
20.2
Player Dossier
2020-2022Western Kentucky
Mitchell Tinsley
WR • 6'1" • 206 lbs • Lee's Summit, MO, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Mitchell Tinsley reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.3
Consistency
71.6
Season Value
53
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Western Kentucky
202021212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Western Kentucky • Penn State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mitchell Tinsley, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Western Kentucky. Mitchell Tinsley reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Western Kentucky paired 1,402 primary output with 89.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Western Kentucky, Penn State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Penn State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
44.4
Efficiency
76.3
Usage
20.2
Consistency
71.6
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah: 49. Purdue: 84. Ohio: 27. Auburn: 47. Central Michigan: 51. Northwestern: 16. Michigan: 57. Minnesota: 58. Ohio State: 24. Indiana: 63. Maryland: 25. Rutgers: 63. Michigan State: 13
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 6 by 54.4. Purdue: 7 by 80. Ohio: 3 by 60. Auburn: 3 by 100. Central Michigan: 4 by 85. Northwestern: 2 by 53.3. Michigan: 5 by 76. Minnesota: 4 by 96.7. Ohio State: 5 by 32. Indiana: 5 by 84. Maryland: 1 by 100. Rutgers: 5 by 84. Michigan State: 1 by 86.7
Split Comparison
Wins45.1 · n=11 · +4.6 vs Losses
Losses40.5 · n=2 · -4.6 vs Wins
First Half47.3 · n=7 · +6.3 vs Second Half
Second Half41 · n=6 · -6.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ Utah | W 35-21 | — | 6 | 49 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Michigan State | W 35-16 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rutgers | W 55-10 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Maryland | W 30-0 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Indiana | W 45-14 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Ohio State | L 31-44 | — | 5 | 24 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Minnesota | W 45-17 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Michigan | L 17-41 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Northwestern | W 17-7 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Central Michigan | W 33-14 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Auburn | W 41-12 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Ohio | W 46-10 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 14 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Purdue | W 35-31 | — | 7 | 84 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 27 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Western Kentucky
2020-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Penn State
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
202020202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 377 | 57.7 | 21 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 377 | 57.7 | 21 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 1,402 | 89.6 | 18.4 | 1,025 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 1,402 | 89.6 | 18.4 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Penn State | 577 | 76.3 | 20.2 | -825 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Penn State | 577 | 76.3 | 20.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
198
Primary metric
198 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTSA
173
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
173 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Purdue
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Liberty
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
164
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Western Kentucky
1,402 primary output · 89.6 efficiency · 18.4 usage
69.7
#2
2021 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
69.7
1,402 primary · 89.6 efficiency · 18.4 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Penn State
53
577 primary · 76.3 efficiency · 20.2 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,356
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.