Usage Score
29.5
Player Dossier
2021-2025Louisiana Tech
Marquis Crosby
RB • 5'9" • 199 lbs • Hattiesburg, MS, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Marquis Crosby leans balanced backfield option traits and 21.7 efficiency.
Efficiency
47.8
Consistency
64.7
Season Value
60.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
212223242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Louisiana Tech • Oregon State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marquis Crosby, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech. Marquis Crosby leans balanced backfield option traits and 21.7 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Louisiana Tech paired 982 primary output with 47.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 47.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Louisiana Tech, Oregon State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 196 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
81.8
Efficiency
47.8
Usage
29.5
Consistency
64.7
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 30. Unknown: 196. Clemson: 7. South Alabama: 21. UTEP: 75. North Texas: 46. Rice: 88. Florida International: 114. Middle Tennessee: 123. UTSA: 47. Charlotte: 115. UAB: 120
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 9 by 34.4. Unknown: 16 by 100. Clemson: 12 by 6.1. South Alabama: 10 by 21.9. UTEP: 14 by 55.8. North Texas: 9 by 53.2. Rice: 15 by 63.3. Florida International: 22 by 55.8. Middle Tennessee: 24 by 53.4. UTSA: 17 by 28.8. Charlotte: 23 by 52.1. UAB: 21 by 48.8
Split Comparison
Wins99 · n=2 · +33.7 vs Losses
Losses65.3 · n=9 · -33.7 vs Wins
First Half62.5 · n=6 · -38.7 vs Second Half
Second Half101.2 · n=6 · +38.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs UAB | L 27-37 | 18 | 72 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 48 | 5.7 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Charlotte100 rush yards · 2+ TD | L 21-26 | 21 | 105 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 5 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ UTSA | L 7-51 | 17 | 47 | 2.80 | 0 | — | — | 2.8 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Middle Tennessee100 rush yards | W 40-24 | 24 | 123 | 5.10 | 0 | — | — | 5.1 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Florida International100 rush yards · 2+ TD | L 34-42 | 21 | 115 | 5.50 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 5.2 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Rice | L 41-42 | 14 | 87 | 6.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5.9 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ North Texas | L 27-47 | 9 | 46 | 5.10 | 0 | — | — | 5.1 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs UTEP | W 41-31 | 14 | 75 | 5.40 | 0 | — | — | 5.4 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ South Alabama | L 14-38 | 10 | 21 | 2.10 | 0 | — | — | 2.1 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Clemson | L 20-48 | 12 | 7 | 0.60 | 1 | — | — | 0.6 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | — | 16 | 196 | 12.30 | 2 | — | — | 12.3 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Missouri | L 24-52 | 7 | 23 | 3.30 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3.3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisiana Tech
2021-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Oregon State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202120222023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 982 | 47.8 | 29.5 | 982 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 20 | 100 | 2.5 | -962 |
| 2024 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 229 | 43.7 | 9.7 | 209 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 229 | 43.7 | 9.7 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oregon State | 15 | 21.7 | 2.6 | -214 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 196 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
196
Primary metric
196 scrimmage yards and 28.6 usage.
#2
UTEP
20
Primary metric
Win with 20 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
20 scrimmage yards and 2.5 usage.
#3
Middle Tennessee
41
Primary metric
Win with 41 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
41 scrimmage yards and 7.6 usage.
#4
Kennesaw State
31
Primary metric
Win with 31 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
31 scrimmage yards and 4.8 usage.
#5
Unknown
44
Primary metric
Game with 44 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
44 scrimmage yards and 15.8 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
982 primary output · 47.8 efficiency · 29.5 usage
60.2
#2
2023 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
51.1
20 primary · 100 efficiency · 2.5 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
33.1
229 primary · 43.7 efficiency · 9.7 usage
Milestones
5
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8115
Seminary · Seminary, MS
- Committed To
- Louisiana Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,246
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.