Usage Score
13.8
Player Dossier
2020-2024Colorado
Chris Carpenter
WR • 5'11" • 160 lbs • Jacksonville, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Chris Carpenter reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
62.7
Consistency
45.5
Season Value
54.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Colorado
2021222223232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Colorado • UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Carpenter, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Colorado. Chris Carpenter reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Colorado paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 62.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Colorado, UTSA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · UTSA
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
39.9
Efficiency
62.7
Usage
13.8
Consistency
45.5
Best Game by takeover score
Coastal Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Coastal Carolina: 16. Kennesaw State: -2. Texas State: 43. Texas: 6. Unknown: 29. East Carolina: 61. Rice: 36. Florida Atlantic: 58. Tulsa: 115. Memphis: 108. North Texas: 9. Temple: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 53.3. Kennesaw State: 1 by 0. Texas State: 2 by 100. Texas: 1 by 40. Unknown: 3 by 64.4. East Carolina: 6 by 67.8. Rice: 6 by 40. Florida Atlantic: 6 by 64.4. Tulsa: 7 by 100. Memphis: 4 by 100. North Texas: 1 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins31.5 · n=6 · -20.7 vs Losses
Losses52.2 · n=5 · +20.7 vs Wins
First Half25.5 · n=6 · -28.8 vs Second Half
Second Half54.3 · n=6 · +28.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/23 | vs Coastal Carolina | W 44-15 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Temple | W 51-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs North Texas | W 48-27 | — | 1 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Memphis100 receiving yards | W 44-36 | — | 4 | 108 | 19.5 | 27 | 0 | 60 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Tulsa100 receiving yards | L 45-46 | — | 7 | 115 | 16.1 | 16.40 | 1 | 69 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 38-24 | — | 6 | 58 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Rice | L 27-29 | — | 6 | 36 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ East Carolina | L 20-30 | — | 6 | 61 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Texas | L 7-56 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Texas State | L 10-49 | — | 2 | 43 | 21.5 | 21.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Kennesaw State | W 28-16 | — | 1 | -2 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Colorado
2020-2021
Opening stop
- 2
UTSA
2022-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
20202021202220222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Colorado | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Colorado | 45 | 49.3 | 9.6 | 45 |
| 2022 Postseason | UTSA | 71 | 48.9 | 15.9 | 26 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 71 | 48.9 | 15.9 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | UTSA | 52 | 55.3 | 8 | -19 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 52 | 55.3 | 8 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | UTSA | 479 | 62.7 | 13.8 | 427 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTSA | 479 | 62.7 | 13.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115
Primary metric
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona
19
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Houston
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Washington
15
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Colorado
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2024 Postseason · UTSA
54.9
479 primary · 62.7 efficiency · 13.8 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · UTSA
54.9
479 primary · 62.7 efficiency · 13.8 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.8933
Red Oak · Red Oak, TX
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
647
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.