Player Dossier

2020-2022

Oklahoma

Marvin Mims

WR • 5'11" • 184 lbs • Frisco, TX, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Marvin Mims reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

11.3

Efficiency

89.2

Consistency

40.6

Season Value

52.6

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Oklahoma

202021212222

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
Oklahoma
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Marvin Mims, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Oklahoma. Marvin Mims reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Oklahoma paired 1,083 primary output with 83.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 89.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Oklahoma

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

54.2

Efficiency

89.2

Usage

11.3

Consistency

40.6

Best Game by takeover score

Oregon

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 57. Tulane: 117. Unknown: 19. Nebraska: 32. West Virginia: 25. Kansas State: 71. Texas: 136. TCU: 56. Kansas: 14. Texas Tech: 135. Baylor: 17. Iowa State: 22. Oklahoma State: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 2 by 100. Tulane: 5 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 100. Nebraska: 2 by 100. West Virginia: 2 by 83.3. Kansas State: 4 by 100. Texas: 5 by 100. TCU: 2 by 100. Kansas: 1 by 93.3. Texas Tech: 4 by 100. Baylor: 2 by 56.7. Iowa State: 1 by 100. Oklahoma State: 1 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins66.5 · Games = 10 · +56 vs Losses
Losses10.5 · Games = 2 · -56 vs Wins
First Half65.3 · Games = 7 · +24.0 vs Second Half
Second Half41.3 · Games = 6 · -24.0 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Texas

Best efficiency game

100 vs Oregon

Result
Thu 12/30vs OregonW 47-3225728.528.50155
Sun 11/28@ Oklahoma StateL 33-37144404
Sat 11/20vs Iowa StateW 28-211222222022
Sat 11/13@ BaylorL 14-2721710.78.50012
Sat 10/30vs Texas Tech100 receiving yards · 2+ TDW 52-21413533.833.80267
Sat 10/23@ KansasW 35-231141414014
Sat 10/16vs TCUW 52-312562828041
Sat 10/9@ Texas100 receiving yards · 2+ TDW 55-48513627.227.20252
Sat 10/2@ Kansas StateW 37-3147117.817.80040
Sat 9/25vs West VirginiaW 16-1322512.512.50013
Sat 9/18vs NebraskaW 23-162321616023
Sat 9/11vs Unknown1191919019
Sat 9/4vs Tulane100 receiving yardsW 40-35511723.423.40050

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Oklahoma

    2020-2022

    Opening stop

Season Progression

202020202021202120222022
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2020 PostseasonOklahoma61081.615.3
2020 Regular SeasonOklahoma61081.615.30
2021 PostseasonOklahoma70589.211.395
2021 Regular SeasonOklahoma70589.211.30
2022 PostseasonOklahoma1,08383.920.9378
2022 Regular SeasonOklahoma1,08383.920.90

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Kent State

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

163

Primary metric

163 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

TCU

132

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Texas

136

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Texas Tech

162

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Texas Tech

135

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2022 Postseason · Oklahoma

1,083 primary output · 83.9 efficiency · 20.9 usage

68.7

#2

2022 Regular Season · Oklahoma

68.7

1,083 primary · 83.9 efficiency · 20.9 usage

#3

2020 Postseason · Oklahoma

54.5

610 primary · 81.6 efficiency · 15.3 usage

Milestones

9

100+ receiving yards

1

8+ catch outings

6

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2020 · Rating 0.9285

Lone Star · Frisco, TX

Committed To
Oklahoma
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2020

Career Facts

1

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

2,398

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Marvin Mims quick answers

Recruiting profile

4-star recruit

Position
WR
Teams played for
1
Seasons tracked
6
Career receiving yards
2,398