Usage Score
15.3
Player Dossier
2020-2022Oklahoma
Marvin Mims
WR • 5'11" • 184 lbs • Frisco, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Marvin Mims reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.6
Consistency
61
Season Value
54.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Oklahoma
202021212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marvin Mims, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Oklahoma. Marvin Mims reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 1,083 primary output with 83.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
55.5
Efficiency
81.6
Usage
15.3
Consistency
61
Best Game by takeover score
Florida
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 27. Unknown: 80. Kansas State: 31. Iowa State: 33. Texas: 52. TCU: 132. Texas Tech: 60. Kansas: 30. Oklahoma State: 65. Baylor: -1. Iowa State: 101
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 1 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 100. Kansas State: 5 by 41.3. Iowa State: 3 by 73.3. Texas: 4 by 86.7. TCU: 4 by 100. Texas Tech: 4 by 100. Kansas: 2 by 100. Oklahoma State: 3 by 100. Baylor: 1 by 0. Iowa State: 7 by 96.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins58.3 · Games = 8 · +26.3 vs Losses
Losses32 · Games = 2 · -26.3 vs Wins
First Half59.2 · Games = 6 · +8.2 vs Second Half
Second Half51 · Games = 5 · -8.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
TCU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/31 | vs Florida | W 55-20 | — | 1 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 12/19 | @ Iowa State100 receiving yards | W 27-21 | — | 7 | 101 | 12.6 | 14.40 | 1 | 45 |
| Sun 12/6 | vs Baylor | W 27-14 | — | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Oklahoma State | W 41-13 | — | 3 | 65 | 21.7 | 21.70 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Kansas | W 62-9 | — | 2 | 30 | 15.7 | 15 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 11/1 | @ Texas Tech | W 62-28 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ TCU100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 33-14 | — | 4 | 132 | 33 | 33 | 2 | 61 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Texas | W 53-45 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Iowa State | L 30-37 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Kansas State2+ TD | L 35-38 | — | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 6.20 | 2 | 11 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 80 | 26.7 | 26.70 | 1 | 58 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2020-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
202020202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Oklahoma | 610 | 81.6 | 15.3 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 610 | 81.6 | 15.3 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Oklahoma | 705 | 89.2 | 11.3 | 95 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 705 | 89.2 | 11.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Oklahoma | 1,083 | 83.9 | 20.9 | 378 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 1,083 | 83.9 | 20.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
163
Primary metric
163 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
TCU
132
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas Tech
162
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas Tech
135
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Oklahoma
1,083 primary output · 83.9 efficiency · 20.9 usage
68.7
#2
2022 Regular Season · Oklahoma
68.7
1,083 primary · 83.9 efficiency · 20.9 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Oklahoma
54.5
610 primary · 81.6 efficiency · 15.3 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.9285
Lone Star · Frisco, TX
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,398
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.