Usage Score
18.2
Player Dossier
2022-2025UCLA
Carsen Ryan
TE • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Orem, UT, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Carsen Ryan reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.5
Consistency
52.8
Season Value
62.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · BYU
2223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UCLA • Utah • BYU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Carsen Ryan, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · BYU. Carsen Ryan reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
BYU paired 620 primary output with 80.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across UCLA, Utah, BYU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · BYU
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
47.7
Efficiency
80.5
Usage
18.2
Consistency
52.8
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 120. Unknown: 47. Stanford: 36. East Carolina: 63. Colorado: 46. West Virginia: 19. Utah: 36. Iowa State: 13. Texas Tech: 32. TCU: 79. Cincinnati: 16. UCF: 85. Texas Tech: 28
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 8 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Stanford: 3 by 80. East Carolina: 4 by 100. Colorado: 3 by 100. West Virginia: 2 by 63.3. Utah: 4 by 60. Iowa State: 2 by 43.3. Texas Tech: 4 by 53.3. TCU: 4 by 100. Cincinnati: 2 by 53.3. UCF: 5 by 100. Texas Tech: 2 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Wins51.3 · n=10 · +21.3 vs Losses
Losses30 · n=2 · -21.3 vs Wins
First Half52.4 · n=7 · +10.3 vs Second Half
Second Half42.2 · n=6 · -10.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Georgia Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | W 25-21 | — | 8 | 120 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 12/6 | @ Texas Tech | L 7-34 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs UCF | W 41-21 | — | 5 | 85 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Cincinnati | W 26-14 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs TCU | W 44-13 | — | 4 | 79 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Texas Tech | L 7-29 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Iowa State | W 41-27 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 10/19 | vs Utah | W 24-21 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs West Virginia | W 38-24 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/28 | @ Colorado | W 24-21 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ East Carolina | W 34-13 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 1 | 24 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Stanford | W 27-3 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 1 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UCLA
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Utah
2024
Peak year stop
- 3
BYU
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | UCLA | 82 | 68.9 | 7.9 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | UCLA | 205 | 81.2 | 8.4 | 123 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Utah | 113 | 52.7 | 11.4 | -92 |
| 2025 Postseason | BYU | 620 | 80.5 | 18.2 | 507 |
| 2025 Regular Season | BYU | 620 | 80.5 | 18.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120
Primary metric
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Colorado
78
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
58
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UCF
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · BYU
620 primary output · 80.5 efficiency · 18.2 usage
62.9
#2
2025 Regular Season · BYU
62.9
620 primary · 80.5 efficiency · 18.2 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · UCLA
45.3
205 primary · 81.2 efficiency · 8.4 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.901
American Fork · American Fork, UT
- Committed To
- UCLA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
3
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,020
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 30 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.