Usage Score
13.9
Player Dossier
2022-2025Michigan
Alex Orji
QB • 6'3" • 240 lbs • Sachse, TX, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Alex Orji is a balanced quarterback profile with 8.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
50
Consistency
59.5
Season Value
55.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Michigan
222323242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Michigan • UNLV
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alex Orji, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Michigan. Alex Orji is a balanced quarterback profile with 8.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Michigan paired 420 primary output with 50 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 50 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, UNLV.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 81.8th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Michigan
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
38.2
Efficiency
50
Usage
13.9
Consistency
59.5
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 11. Fresno State: 35. Texas: -1. Arkansas State: 39. USC: 75. Minnesota: 98. Washington: 26. Michigan State: 64. Oregon: 40. Indiana: 1. Ohio State: 32
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 7 by 23.7. Fresno State: 7 by 56.6. Texas: 2 by 0. Arkansas State: 7 by 66.3. USC: 25 by 53.4. Minnesota: 27 by 46.6. Washington: 10 by 49.3. Michigan State: 6 by 100. Oregon: 9 by 50.3. Indiana: 3 by 3.3. Ohio State: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins50.6 · n=7 · +34.1 vs Losses
Losses16.5 · n=4 · -34.1 vs Wins
First Half42.8 · n=6 · +10.2 vs Second Half
Second Half32.6 · n=5 · -10.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/31 | vs Alabama | W 19-13 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 66.7 | 0 | 1 | 23.7 | 4 | 9 | 2.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Ohio State | W 13-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100 | 3 | 32 | 10.70 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Indiana | L 15-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.3 | 3 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Oregon | L 17-38 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 50.3 | 6 | 39 | 6.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Michigan StateDual-threat | W 24-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100 | 6 | 64 | 10.70 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Washington | L 17-27 | 3 | 7 | 15 | 42.9 | 0 | 0 | 49.3 | 3 | 11 | 3.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Minnesota | W 27-24 | 10 | 18 | 86 | 55.6 | 1 | 1 | 46.6 | 9 | 12 | 1.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs USC | W 27-24 | 7 | 12 | 32 | 58.3 | 0 | 0 | 53.4 | 13 | 43 | 3.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Arkansas State | W 28-18 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | 66.3 | 3 | 27 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Texas | L 12-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | -1 | -0.50 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Fresno State | W 30-10 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | 56.6 | 5 | 32 | 6.40 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2022-2024
Opening stop
- 2
UNLV
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202220232023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan | 42 | 45.1 | 4.8 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Michigan | 86 | 56.5 | 7.3 | 44 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Michigan | 86 | 56.5 | 7.3 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Michigan | 420 | 50 | 13.9 | 334 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Michigan | 420 | 50 | 13.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UNLV | 79 | 40.8 | 8.7 | -341 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 71 yards of offense and 89.2 efficiency.
71
Primary metric
71 total offense with 89.2 efficiency.
#2
UConn
35
Primary metric
Win with 35 yards of offense and 85.4 efficiency.
35 total offense with 85.4 efficiency.
#3
Ohio State
22
Primary metric
Win with 22 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
22 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#4
Michigan State
64
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
64 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#5
Michigan State
27
Primary metric
Win with 27 yards of offense and 54 efficiency.
27 total offense with 54 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Michigan
420 primary output · 50 efficiency · 13.9 usage
55.8
#2
2024 Regular Season · Michigan
55.8
420 primary · 50 efficiency · 13.9 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Michigan
36.4
86 primary · 56.5 efficiency · 7.3 usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
7
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8848
Sachse · Sachse, TX
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
627
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 23 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.