Usage Score
17.8
Player Dossier
2021-2024Oklahoma State
JP Richardson
WR • 6'0" • 190 lbs • Missouri City, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
JP Richardson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74
Consistency
63.2
Season Value
63.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · TCU
21212222232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Oklahoma State • TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
JP Richardson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · TCU. JP Richardson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
TCU paired 733 primary output with 74 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oklahoma State, TCU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · TCU
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
56.4
Efficiency
74
Usage
17.8
Consistency
63.2
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana: 53. Stanford: 107. Unknown: 25. UCF: 46. SMU: 14. Kansas: 42. Houston: 98. Utah: 53. Texas Tech: 35. Baylor: 3. Oklahoma State: 100. Arizona: 107. Cincinnati: 50
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana: 5 by 70.7. Stanford: 6 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 83.3. UCF: 5 by 61.3. SMU: 3 by 31.1. Kansas: 4 by 70. Houston: 9 by 72.6. Utah: 3 by 100. Texas Tech: 4 by 58.3. Baylor: 1 by 20. Oklahoma State: 7 by 95.2. Arizona: 6 by 100. Cincinnati: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins68.4 · n=8 · +28.1 vs Losses
Losses40.3 · n=4 · -28.1 vs Wins
First Half55 · n=7 · -3 vs Second Half
Second Half58 · n=6 · +3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
100 vs Cincinnati
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | vs Louisiana | W 34-3 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Cincinnati | W 20-13 | — | 2 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Arizona100 receiving yards | W 49-28 | — | 6 | 107 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 38 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs Oklahoma State100 receiving yards | W 38-13 | — | 7 | 100 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 34 |
| Sun 11/3 | @ Baylor | L 34-37 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Texas Tech | W 35-34 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 10/20 | @ Utah | W 13-7 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Fri 10/4 | vs HoustonHigh volume | L 19-30 | — | 9 | 98 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Kansas | W 38-27 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ SMU | L 42-66 | — | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 4.70 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs UCF | L 34-35 | — | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Stanford100 receiving yards | W 34-27 | — | 6 | 107 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 34 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma State
2021-2022
Opening stop
- 2
TCU
2023-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
2021202120222022202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 168 | 50.5 | 17.3 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 168 | 50.5 | 17.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 503 | 61.7 | 17.4 | 335 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 503 | 61.7 | 17.4 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | TCU | 536 | 67.8 | 14.7 | 33 |
| 2024 Postseason | TCU | 733 | 74 | 17.8 | 197 |
| 2024 Regular Season | TCU | 733 | 74 | 17.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107
Primary metric
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Iowa State
90
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Stanford
107
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
BYU
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oklahoma State
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 95.2 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · TCU
733 primary output · 74 efficiency · 17.8 usage
63.8
#2
2024 Regular Season · TCU
63.8
733 primary · 74 efficiency · 17.8 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · TCU
54.3
536 primary · 67.8 efficiency · 14.7 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,940
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.