Usage Score
8.2
Player Dossier
2021-2025Mississippi State
Nic Mitchell
LB • 6'2" • 230 lbs • Jacksonville, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Nic Mitchell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
31.5
Consistency
7.7
Season Value
14.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Mississippi State
212223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Mississippi State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nic Mitchell, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Mississippi State. Nic Mitchell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Mississippi State paired 0 primary output with 12.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 31.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Mississippi State
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
31.5
Usage
8.2
Consistency
7.7
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 0. Southern Miss: 0. Arizona State: 0. Unknown: 0. Northern Illinois: 0.5. Tennessee: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Florida: 0. Texas: 2. Arkansas: 2. Georgia: 0. Missouri: 4. Ole Miss: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 6 by 25. Southern Miss: 5 by 20.8. Arizona State: 9 by 37.5. Unknown: 4 by 16.7. Northern Illinois: 3 by 17.5. Tennessee: 2 by 8.3. Texas A&M: 7 by 29.2. Florida: 6 by 25. Texas: 7 by 49.2. Arkansas: 10 by 61.7. Georgia: 6 by 25. Missouri: 6 by 65. Ole Miss: 7 by 29.2
Split Comparison
Wins0.6 · n=4 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · n=8 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.1 · n=7 · -1.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · n=6 · +1.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Missouri
Best efficiency game
65 vs Missouri
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | vs Wake Forest | L 29-43 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Ole Miss | L 19-38 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/16 | @ MissouriSplash game | L 27-49 | 6 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Georgia | L 21-41 | 6 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Arkansas10+ tackles | W 38-35 | 10 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Texas | L 38-45 | 7 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Florida | L 21-23 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Texas A&M | L 9-31 | 7 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Tennessee | L 34-41 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Northern Illinois | W 38-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Arizona State | W 24-20 | 9 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Southern Miss | W 34-17 | 5 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Mississippi State
2021-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202120222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | 12.5 | 1.8 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | 7 | 1.1 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | 9.7 | 1.6 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 6 | 32.8 | 7.5 | 6 |
| 2025 Postseason | Mississippi State | 8.5 | 31.5 | 8.2 | 2.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 8.5 | 31.5 | 8.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Missouri
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.3 takeover score.
#2
Arkansas
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 56.3 takeover score.
#3
Arkansas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44 takeover score.
#4
Texas
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 36.5 takeover score.
#5
Texas A&M
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 36 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Mississippi State
0 primary output · 12.5 efficiency · 1.8 usage
38.1
#2
2023 Regular Season · Mississippi State
37.1
0 primary · 9.7 efficiency · 1.6 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Mississippi State
36
0 primary · 7 efficiency · 1.1 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.85
Hopkins · Hopkins, MN
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
173
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.