Usage Score
23.4
Player Profile
Anthony Smith
WR • 6'3" • 189 lbs • Huntingtown, MD, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Anthony Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.2
Consistency
58.8
Season Value
65.9
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · East Carolina
2021222324242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Primary stop by seasons
- NC State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · East Carolina
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Anthony Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · East Carolina. Anthony Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
East Carolina paired 1,053 primary output with 81.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across NC State, East Carolina.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · East Carolina
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
81
Efficiency
81.2
Usage
23.4
Consistency
58.8
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 156. NC State: 66. Unknown: 39. Coastal Carolina: 136. BYU: 24. Army: 87. Tulane: 54. Tulsa: 150. Temple: 58. Charlotte: 69. Memphis: 62. UTSA: 143. Florida Atlantic: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 4 by 100. NC State: 6 by 73.3. Unknown: 6 by 43.3. Coastal Carolina: 11 by 82.4. BYU: 2 by 80. Army: 3 by 100. Tulane: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 4 by 100. Temple: 2 by 100. Charlotte: 8 by 57.5. Memphis: 7 by 59. UTSA: 8 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins90.9 · n=8 · +19.1 vs Losses
Losses71.8 · n=4 · -19.1 vs Wins
First Half80.3 · n=7 · -1.5 vs Second Half
Second Half81.8 · n=6 · +1.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
100 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Pittsburgh100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 23-17 | — | 4 | 156 | 39 | 39 | 2 | 72 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 42-3 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ UTSA100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-58 | — | 8 | 143 | 17.9 | 17.90 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Memphis | W 31-27 | — | 7 | 62 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs CharlotteHigh volume | W 48-22 | — | 8 | 69 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Temple | W 45-14 | — | 2 | 58 | 34.3 | 29 | 0 | 35 |
| Thu 10/16 | vs Tulsa100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 41-27 | — | 4 | 150 | 37.5 | 37.50 | 2 | 66 |
| Thu 10/9 | @ Tulane | L 19-26 | — | 2 | 54 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 49 |
| Thu 9/25 | vs Army | W 28-6 | — | 3 | 87 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs BYU | L 13-34 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Coastal Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-0 | — | 11 | 136 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 39 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Thu 8/28 | @ NC State | L 17-24 | — | 6 | 66 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
NC State
2020-2023
Opening stop
- 2
East Carolina
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20202021202220232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | NC State | 69 | 70 | 11 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | NC State | 97 | 100 | 7.5 | 28 |
| 2022 Regular Season | NC State | 58 | 100 | 8.7 | -39 |
| 2023 Regular Season | NC State | 19 | 63.3 | 6.4 | -39 |
| 2024 Postseason | East Carolina | 799 | 84.4 | 17.4 | 780 |
| 2024 Regular Season | East Carolina | 799 | 84.4 | 17.4 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | East Carolina | 1,053 | 81.2 | 23.4 | 254 |
| 2025 Regular Season | East Carolina | 1,053 | 81.2 | 23.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
156
Primary metric
156 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTSA
143
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
North Texas
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Florida Atlantic
120
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
150
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
150 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · East Carolina
1,053 primary output · 81.2 efficiency · 23.4 usage
65.9
#2
2025 Regular Season · East Carolina
65.9
1,053 primary · 81.2 efficiency · 23.4 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · East Carolina
64.2
799 primary · 84.4 efficiency · 17.4 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,095
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 35 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.