Usage Score
24.6
Player Dossier
2020-2023Tulane
QB • 6'3" • 220 lbs • Boca Raton, FL, USA
Michael Pratt is a balanced quarterback profile with 24.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
24.6
Efficiency
66.8
Consistency
79.6
Season Value
67.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Tulane
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Pratt, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Tulane. Michael Pratt is a balanced quarterback profile with 24.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Tulane paired 3,488 primary output with 66.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 66.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Win with 442 yards of offense and 82 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
268.3
Efficiency
66.8
Usage
24.6
Consistency
79.6
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 317. Massachusetts: 219. Unknown: 315. Kansas State: 263. Southern Miss: 305. East Carolina: 310. South Florida: 344. Memphis: 177. Tulsa: 161. UCF: 232. SMU: 211. Cincinnati: 192. UCF: 442
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 32 by 75.6. Massachusetts: 27 by 76.7. Unknown: 23 by 70.2. Kansas State: 39 by 60.6. Southern Miss: 45 by 64.7. East Carolina: 43 by 64.8. South Florida: 51 by 63.4. Memphis: 38 by 58.9. Tulsa: 30 by 56.1. UCF: 45 by 52.4. SMU: 24 by 79.6. Cincinnati: 31 by 63.4. UCF: 39 by 82
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
UCF
Best efficiency game
82 vs UCF
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ USCDual-threat | W 46-45 | 8 | 17 | 234 | 47.1 | 2 | 0 | 75.6 | 15 | 83 | 5.50 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs UCF300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 45-28 | 20 | 33 | 394 | 60.6 | 4 | 1 | 82 | 6 | 48 | 8 | 1 | 19 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Cincinnati | W 27-24 | 13 | 22 | 162 | 59.1 | 1 | 0 | 63.4 | 9 | 30 | 3.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 11/18 | vs SMU3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 59-24 | 9 | 14 | 141 | 64.3 | 3 | 0 | 79.6 | 10 | 70 | 7 | 3 | 26 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs UCF3+ TD | L 31-38 | 23 | 39 | 236 | 59.0 | 3 | 0 | 52.4 | 6 | -4 | -0.70 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Tulsa | W 27-13 | 11 | 19 | 125 | 57.9 | 2 | 1 | 56.1 | 11 | 36 | 3.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Memphis | W 38-28 | 20 | 29 | 158 | 69.0 | 1 | 0 | 58.9 | 9 | 19 | 2.10 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ South Florida300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 45-31 | 23 | 35 | 329 | 65.7 | 2 | 0 | 63.4 | 16 | 15 | 0.90 | 2 | 15 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs East Carolina300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 24-9 | 27 | 34 | 326 | 79.4 | 2 | 0 | 64.8 | 9 | -16 | -1.80 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Southern MissDual-threat | L 24-27 | 19 | 29 | 247 | 65.5 | 1 | 1 | 64.7 | 16 | 58 | 3.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Kansas StateDual-threat | W 17-10 | 13 | 26 | 176 | 50.0 | 1 | 2 | 60.6 | 13 | 87 | 6.70 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown300-yard game · 3+ TD | — | 17 | 21 | 318 | 81.0 | 3 | 0 | 70.2 | 2 | -3 | -1.50 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Massachusetts3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 42-10 | 12 | 20 | 164 | 60.0 | 2 | 0 | 76.7 | 7 | 55 | 7.90 | 1 | 20 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulane
2020-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Tulane | 2,043 | 56.9 | 26.9 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Tulane | 2,043 | 56.9 | 26.9 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Tulane | 2,535 | 59.1 | 27.2 | 492 |
| 2022 Postseason | Tulane | 3,488 | 66.8 | 24.6 | 953 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tulane | 3,488 | 66.8 | 24.6 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Tulane | 2,692 | 64.8 | 24.1 | -796 |
#1 Featured game
South Alabama
Win with 333 yards of offense and 82.2 efficiency.
333
Primary metric
333 total offense with 82.2 efficiency.
#2
Oklahoma
330
Primary metric
Loss with 330 yards of offense and 60 efficiency.
330 total offense with 60 efficiency.
#3
UCF
442
Primary metric
Win with 442 yards of offense and 82 efficiency.
442 total offense with 82 efficiency.
#4
Memphis
278
Primary metric
Win with 278 yards of offense and 60.5 efficiency.
278 total offense with 60.5 efficiency.
#5
South Florida
332
Primary metric
Win with 332 yards of offense and 74.4 efficiency.
332 total offense with 74.4 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Tulane
3,488 primary output · 66.8 efficiency · 24.6 usage
67.8
#2
2022 Regular Season · Tulane
67.8
3,488 primary · 66.8 efficiency · 24.6 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Tulane
65.9
2,692 primary · 64.8 efficiency · 24.1 usage
19
250+ passing yards
11
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
28
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
10,758
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Michael Pratt quick answers