Usage Score
7.4
Player Dossier
2021-2025Rice
Aaron Turner
WR • 5'8" • 184 lbs • Ellicott, MD, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Aaron Turner reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
56.8
Consistency
61.9
Season Value
35.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · UConn
21222223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- UConn • Cincinnati • Rice
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Aaron Turner, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · UConn. Aaron Turner reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
UConn paired 529 primary output with 56 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 56.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across UConn, Cincinnati, Rice.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
9.9
Efficiency
56.8
Usage
7.4
Consistency
61.9
Best Game by takeover score
West Virginia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 14. Pittsburgh: 1. Oklahoma: 11. BYU: 17. Iowa State: 4. Baylor: 7. Oklahoma State: 21. Houston: 14. West Virginia: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 31.1. Pittsburgh: 1 by 6.7. Oklahoma: 1 by 73.3. BYU: 1 by 100. Iowa State: 1 by 26.7. Baylor: 2 by 23.3. Oklahoma State: 1 by 100. Houston: 1 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins7.5 · Games = 2 · -2.5 vs Losses
Losses10 · Games = 6 · +2.5 vs Wins
First Half9.4 · Games = 5 · -1.1 vs Second Half
Second Half10.5 · Games = 4 · +1.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/18 | @ West Virginia | L 21-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Houston | W 24-14 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 10/29 | @ Oklahoma State | L 13-45 | — | 1 | 21 | 14 | 21 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Baylor | L 29-32 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Iowa State | L 10-30 | — | 1 | 4 | 2.3 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ BYU | L 27-35 | — | 1 | 17 | 11.5 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Oklahoma | L 6-20 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Pittsburgh | W 27-21 | — | 1 | 1 | 7.7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 14 | 7.5 | 4.70 | 1 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UConn
2021-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Cincinnati
2023-2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Rice
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2021202220222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | UConn | 232 | 42 | 19.6 | — |
| 2022 Postseason | UConn | 529 | 56 | 35.7 | 297 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UConn | 529 | 56 | 35.7 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 89 | 56.8 | 7.4 | -440 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 85 | 68.9 | 11.4 | -4 |
| 2025 Postseason | Rice | 398 | 40.6 | 41.8 | 313 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Rice | 398 | 40.6 | 41.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Florida
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99
Primary metric
99 receiving yards with a 94.3 efficiency score.
#2
Boston College
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
65
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Syracuse
72
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Clemson
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 78.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · UConn
529 primary output · 56 efficiency · 35.7 usage
61.3
#2
2022 Regular Season · UConn
61.3
529 primary · 56 efficiency · 35.7 usage
#3
2025 Postseason · Rice
48.4
398 primary · 40.6 efficiency · 41.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8396
Gonzaga · Washington, DC
- Committed To
- UConn
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
3
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,333
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 48 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.