Usage Score
36
Player Dossier
2021-2025Wisconsin
Skyler Bell
WR • 6'0" • 185 lbs • Bronx, NY, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Skyler Bell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.4
Consistency
81.5
Season Value
73.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UConn
21222223242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Wisconsin • UConn
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Skyler Bell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UConn. Skyler Bell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
UConn paired 1,276 primary output with 77.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Wisconsin, UConn.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · UConn
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
106.3
Efficiency
77.4
Usage
36
Consistency
81.5
Best Game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 135. Syracuse: 105. Delaware: 92. Ball State: 113. Buffalo: 54. Florida International: 63. Boston College: 125. Rice: 158. UAB: 149. Duke: 87. Air Force: 70. Florida Atlantic: 125
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 100. Syracuse: 11 by 63.6. Delaware: 7 by 87.6. Ball State: 14 by 53.8. Buffalo: 6 by 60. Florida International: 6 by 70. Boston College: 10 by 83.3. Rice: 8 by 100. UAB: 8 by 100. Duke: 11 by 52.7. Air Force: 8 by 58.3. Florida Atlantic: 8 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins98.3 · n=8 · -20.1 vs Losses
Losses118.3 · n=3 · +20.1 vs Wins
First Half93.7 · n=6 · -25.3 vs Second Half
Second Half119 · n=6 · +25.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida Atlantic
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/22 | @ Florida Atlantic100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-45 | — | 8 | 125 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Air ForceHigh volume | W 26-16 | — | 8 | 70 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs DukeHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 37-34 | — | 11 | 87 | 7.9 | 7.90 | 2 | 21 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs UAB100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-19 | — | 8 | 149 | 18.6 | 18.60 | 3 | 39 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Rice100 receiving yards · High volume | L 34-37 | — | 8 | 158 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 1 | 80 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Boston College100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-23 | — | 10 | 125 | 11.2 | 12.50 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Florida International2+ TD | W 51-10 | — | 6 | 63 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 2 | 18 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Buffalo | W 20-17 | — | 6 | 54 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Ball State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-25 | — | 14 | 113 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Delaware | L 41-44 | — | 7 | 92 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Syracuse100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-27 | — | 11 | 105 | 8.8 | 9.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 4 | 135 | 33.8 | 33.80 | 2 | 80 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2021-2023
Opening stop
- 2
UConn
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2021202220222023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Wisconsin | 15 | 100 | 9.1 | — |
| 2022 Postseason | Wisconsin | 444 | 75.1 | 17.2 | 429 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 444 | 75.1 | 17.2 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 297 | 52.4 | 16.8 | -147 |
| 2024 Postseason | UConn | 860 | 80.6 | 23 | 563 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UConn | 860 | 80.6 | 23 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UConn | 1,276 | 77.4 | 36 | 416 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
153
Primary metric
153 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UAB
149
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Maryland
141
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico State
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Rice
158
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
158 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · UConn
1,276 primary output · 77.4 efficiency · 36 usage
73.5
#2
2024 Postseason · UConn
54.9
860 primary · 80.6 efficiency · 23 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · UConn
54.9
860 primary · 80.6 efficiency · 23 usage
Milestones
12
100+ receiving yards
9
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.85
Chaparral · Temecula, CA
- Committed To
- Northern Colorado
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,892
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 49 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.