Usage Score
20.9
Player Dossier
2021-2025Purdue
Deion Burks
WR • 5'9" • 188 lbs • Belleville, MI, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Deion Burks reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
72.8
Consistency
57.1
Season Value
61.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Purdue
2121222223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Purdue • Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Deion Burks, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Purdue. Deion Burks reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Purdue paired 629 primary output with 72.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 72.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, Oklahoma.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
52.4
Efficiency
72.8
Usage
20.9
Consistency
57.1
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 152. Virginia Tech: 18. Syracuse: 51. Wisconsin: 73. Illinois: 83. Iowa: 19. Ohio State: 22. Nebraska: 8. Michigan: 43. Minnesota: 60. Northwestern: 13. Indiana: 87
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fresno State: 4 by 100. Virginia Tech: 1 by 100. Syracuse: 4 by 85. Wisconsin: 6 by 81.1. Illinois: 5 by 100. Iowa: 4 by 31.7. Ohio State: 3 by 48.9. Nebraska: 2 by 26.7. Michigan: 3 by 95.6. Minnesota: 4 by 100. Northwestern: 4 by 21.7. Indiana: 7 by 82.9
Split Comparison
Wins62 · n=4 · +14.4 vs Losses
Losses47.6 · n=8 · -14.4 vs Wins
First Half66 · n=6 · +27.2 vs Second Half
Second Half38.8 · n=6 · -27.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Fresno State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Minnesota
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs Indiana | W 35-31 | — | 7 | 87 | 9.2 | 12.40 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Northwestern | L 15-23 | — | 4 | 13 | 3.3 | 3.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Minnesota | W 49-30 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Michigan | L 13-41 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Nebraska | L 14-31 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Ohio State | L 7-41 | — | 3 | 22 | 7 | 7.30 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Iowa | L 14-20 | — | 4 | 19 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Illinois | W 44-19 | — | 5 | 83 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 1 | 44 |
| Fri 9/22 | vs Wisconsin | L 17-38 | — | 6 | 73 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Syracuse | L 20-35 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.2 | 12.80 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Virginia Tech | W 24-17 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Fresno State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 35-39 | — | 4 | 152 | 38 | 38 | 2 | 84 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2021-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Oklahoma
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20212021202220222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Purdue | 26 | 100 | 3.8 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Purdue | 26 | 100 | 3.8 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Purdue | 149 | 58.5 | 7.9 | 123 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Purdue | 149 | 58.5 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Purdue | 629 | 72.8 | 20.9 | 480 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 245 | 53.5 | 33.5 | -384 |
| 2025 Postseason | Oklahoma | 620 | 65.6 | 20.9 | 375 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 620 | 65.6 | 20.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Alabama
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107
Primary metric
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Michigan
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 96.2 efficiency score.
#3
Fresno State
152
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
152 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulane
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 76.2 efficiency score.
#5
Tennessee
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Purdue
629 primary output · 72.8 efficiency · 20.9 usage
61.9
#2
2025 Postseason · Oklahoma
59.5
620 primary · 65.6 efficiency · 20.9 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma
59.5
620 primary · 65.6 efficiency · 20.9 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.8544
Cherry Creek · Englewood, CO
- Committed To
- Wake Forest
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,669
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 44 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.