Usage Score
14.3
Player Dossier
2021-2024Oklahoma State
Collin Oliver
LB • 6'2" • 240 lbs • Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Collin Oliver shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
39.2
Consistency
38
Season Value
32.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Oklahoma State
212122232324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Oklahoma State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Collin Oliver, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Oklahoma State. Collin Oliver shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 27 primary output with 27.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 39.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.9
Efficiency
39.2
Usage
14.3
Consistency
38
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 0. Unknown: 0. Arizona State: 3. South Alabama: 3. Iowa State: 2. Kansas State: 1. Kansas: 7. West Virginia: 1.5. Cincinnati: 1. Oklahoma: 0. UCF: 3. Houston: 3. BYU: 1. Texas: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Arizona State: 7 by 59.2. South Alabama: 10 by 71.7. Iowa State: 5 by 40.8. Kansas State: 3 by 22.5. Kansas: 7 by 79.2. West Virginia: 10 by 56.7. Cincinnati: 7 by 39.2. Oklahoma: 4 by 16.7. UCF: 4 by 46.7. Houston: 4 by 46.7. BYU: 4 by 26.7. Texas: 3 by 22.5
Split Comparison
Wins1.9 · n=9 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses2.3 · n=4 · +0.3 vs Wins
First Half2.3 · n=7 · +0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half1.5 · n=7 · -0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kansas
Best efficiency game
79.2 vs Kansas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/28 | vs Texas A&M | W 31-23 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/2 | @ Texas | L 21-49 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs BYU | W 40-34 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ HoustonSplash game | W 43-30 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ UCFSplash game | L 3-45 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Oklahoma | W 27-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/29 | vs Cincinnati | W 45-13 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ West Virginia10+ tackles | W 48-34 | 10 | 4 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Kansas2+ sacks · Splash game | W 39-32 | 7 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Fri 10/6 | vs Kansas State | W 29-21 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Iowa StateSplash game | L 27-34 | 5 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs South Alabama10+ tackles | L 7-33 | 10 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ Arizona StateSplash game | W 27-15 | 7 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma State
2021-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
202120212022202320232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 27 | 27.9 | 9.3 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 27 | 27.9 | 9.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 13.5 | 20.6 | 6.4 | -13.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 26.5 | 39.2 | 14.3 | 13 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 26.5 | 39.2 | 14.3 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 4 | 28.3 | 14 | -22.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kansas
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 69.2 takeover score.
#2
Baylor
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 66.6 takeover score.
#3
Iowa State
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55 takeover score.
#5
Baylor
4.5
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 54.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Oklahoma State
27 primary output · 27.9 efficiency · 9.3 usage
33.1
#2
2021 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
33.1
27 primary · 27.9 efficiency · 9.3 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Oklahoma State
32.1
26.5 primary · 39.2 efficiency · 14.3 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
11
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8867
Santa Fe · Edmond, OK
- Committed To
- Oklahoma State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
133
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.