Usage Score
28.1
Player Dossier
2020-2024Wyoming
WR • 6'4" • 212 lbs • San Antonio, TX, USA
Joshua Hardeman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
28.1
Efficiency
76.8
Consistency
56.4
Season Value
65
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Wyoming
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joshua Hardeman, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Wyoming. Joshua Hardeman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Wyoming paired 407 primary output with 76.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Wyoming, Houston, South Florida.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
33.9
Efficiency
76.8
Usage
28.1
Consistency
56.4
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 77. Illinois: 14. Unknown: 44. Air Force: 45. BYU: 64. San José State: 25. New Mexico: 16. Utah State: 11. Hawai'i: 50. Colorado State: 18. Boise State: 13. Fresno State: 30
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 5 by 100. Illinois: 2 by 46.7. Unknown: 5 by 58.7. Air Force: 6 by 50. BYU: 4 by 100. San José State: 1 by 100. New Mexico: 1 by 100. Utah State: 1 by 73.3. Hawai'i: 3 by 100. Colorado State: 1 by 100. Boise State: 2 by 43.3. Fresno State: 4 by 50
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Colorado State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Fresno State | L 0-30 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Boise State | L 17-20 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Colorado State | W 14-13 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ Hawai'i | W 27-20 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Utah State | W 28-14 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ New Mexico | W 27-14 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs San José State | L 16-33 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ BYU | L 24-38 | — | 4 | 64 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Air Force | W 17-14 | — | 6 | 45 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Tulsa | W 40-37 | — | 5 | 77 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 8/27 | @ Illinois | L 6-38 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wyoming
2020-2022
Opening stop
Houston
2023
Peak year stop
South Florida
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Wyoming | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Postseason | Wyoming | 245 | 63.3 | 18 | 245 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Wyoming | 245 | 63.3 | 18 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Wyoming | 407 | 76.8 | 28.1 | 162 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Houston | 63 | 59.4 | 6.3 | -344 |
| 2024 Regular Season | South Florida | 140 | 69.5 | 7.6 | 77 |
#1 Featured game
Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76
Primary metric
76 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#2
Tulsa
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
BYU
64
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Hawai'i
50
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Wyoming
407 primary output · 76.8 efficiency · 28.1 usage
65
#2
2021 Postseason · Wyoming
46.8
245 primary · 63.3 efficiency · 18 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Wyoming
46.8
245 primary · 63.3 efficiency · 18 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.82
Wagner · San Antonio, TX
Career Facts
3
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
855
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Joshua Hardeman quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit