Usage Score
20.3
Player Dossier
2021-2024Bowling Green
Jaison Patterson
RB • 6'0" • 220 lbs • Jacksonville, FL, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Jaison Patterson leans balanced backfield option traits and 47.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
43.8
Consistency
66.2
Season Value
57.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Bowling Green
21222223232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaison Patterson, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Bowling Green. Jaison Patterson leans balanced backfield option traits and 47.5 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Bowling Green paired 614 primary output with 43.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 43.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Win with 101 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Bowling Green
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
47.2
Efficiency
43.8
Usage
20.3
Consistency
66.2
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 23. UCLA: 7. Unknown: 48. Marshall: 3. Mississippi State: 27. Akron: 66. Buffalo: 42. Miami (OH): 94. Central Michigan: 101. Western Michigan: 56. Kent State: 71. Toledo: 56. Ohio: 20
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 6 by 39.9. UCLA: 4 by 18.2. Unknown: 18 by 27.8. Marshall: 3 by 19.8. Mississippi State: 8 by 34.6. Akron: 11 by 62.5. Buffalo: 3 by 100. Miami (OH): 18 by 54.4. Central Michigan: 18 by 58.4. Western Michigan: 10 by 58.3. Kent State: 18 by 36.7. Toledo: 16 by 35. Ohio: 9 by 24.4
Split Comparison
Wins62.7 · n=6 · +31.0 vs Losses
Losses31.7 · n=6 · -31.0 vs Wins
First Half30.9 · n=7 · -35.5 vs Second Half
Second Half66.3 · n=6 · +35.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/26 | vs New Mexico State | L 19-24 | 6 | 23 | 3.80 | 0 | — | — | 3.8 |
| Wed 11/23 | @ Ohio | L 14-38 | 7 | 17 | 2.40 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2.2 |
| Wed 11/16 | @ Toledo | W 42-35 | 15 | 49 | 3.30 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3.5 |
| Thu 11/10 | vs Kent State | L 6-40 | 16 | 52 | 3.30 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 3.9 |
| Wed 11/2 | vs Western Michigan | W 13-9 | 10 | 56 | 5.60 | 0 | — | — | 5.6 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Central Michigan100 rush yards | W 34-18 | 18 | 101 | 5.60 | 0 | — | — | 5.6 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Miami (OH) | W 17-13 | 18 | 94 | 5.20 | 0 | — | — | 5.2 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Buffalo | L 7-38 | 3 | 42 | 14 | 0 | — | — | 14 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Akron | W 31-28 | 11 | 66 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Mississippi State | L 14-45 | 7 | 23 | 3.30 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3.4 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Marshall | W 34-31 | 2 | 5 | 2.50 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 1 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 18 | 48 | 2.70 | 1 | — | — | 2.7 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ UCLA | L 17-45 | 4 | 7 | 1.80 | 0 | — | — | 1.8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2021-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
2021202220222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 347 | 46.6 | 14.8 | — |
| 2022 Postseason | Bowling Green | 614 | 43.8 | 20.3 | 267 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 614 | 43.8 | 20.3 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Bowling Green | 151 | 38.4 | 7.1 | -463 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 151 | 38.4 | 7.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Bowling Green | 531 | 47.5 | 16 | 380 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 531 | 47.5 | 16 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Win with 88 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
88
Primary metric
88 scrimmage yards and 18.5 usage.
#2
Central Michigan
101
Primary metric
Win with 101 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
101 scrimmage yards and 30.5 usage.
#3
Akron
86
Primary metric
Loss with 86 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
86 scrimmage yards and 29.1 usage.
#4
Western Michigan
35
Primary metric
Win with 35 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
35 scrimmage yards and 8.5 usage.
#5
Miami (OH)
94
Primary metric
Win with 94 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
94 scrimmage yards and 30 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Bowling Green
614 primary output · 43.8 efficiency · 20.3 usage
57.6
#2
2022 Regular Season · Bowling Green
57.6
614 primary · 43.8 efficiency · 20.3 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Bowling Green
53.2
531 primary · 47.5 efficiency · 16 usage
Milestones
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8207
Ed White · Jacksonville, FL
- Committed To
- Bowling Green
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,643
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.