Usage Score
22.5
Player Dossier
2020-2025Arkansas State
Lincoln Pare
RB • 5'9" • 200 lbs • Germantown, TN, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Lincoln Pare leans workhorse runner traits and 56.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
49.4
Consistency
70
Season Value
49.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas State
2021222324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Arkansas State • Texas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lincoln Pare, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas State. Lincoln Pare leans workhorse runner traits and 56.5 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas State paired 1,440 primary output with 56.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 49.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arkansas State, Texas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia State
Loss with 151 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Arkansas State
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
66.5
Efficiency
49.4
Usage
22.5
Consistency
70
Best Game by takeover score
Texas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 76. Washington: 76. Tulsa: 20. Georgia Southern: 79. Coastal Carolina: 28. Louisiana: 63. South Alabama: 32. App State: 37. UL Monroe: 91. Georgia State: 151. Texas State: 78
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 10 by 69.2. Washington: 10 by 46.3. Tulsa: 8 by 26. Georgia Southern: 10 by 81.1. Coastal Carolina: 7 by 46.9. Louisiana: 14 by 48.3. South Alabama: 8 by 41.7. App State: 9 by 42.8. UL Monroe: 24 by 36.5. Georgia State: 19 by 49. Texas State: 15 by 55.1
Split Comparison
Losses64 · n=10
First Half57 · n=6 · -20.8 vs Second Half
Second Half77.8 · n=5 · +20.8 vs First Half
All Games66.5 · n=11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia State
Best efficiency game
81.1 vs Georgia Southern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | vs Texas State | L 22-24 | 14 | 75 | 5.40 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5.2 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Georgia State150 scrimmage yards | L 20-28 | 13 | 33 | 2.50 | 0 | 6 | 118 | 7.9 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ UL Monroe | W 27-24 | 22 | 73 | 3.30 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 3.8 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs App State | L 14-48 | 9 | 37 | 4.10 | 0 | — | — | 4.1 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ South Alabama | L 13-31 | 8 | 32 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Thu 10/21 | vs Louisiana | L 27-28 | 11 | 52 | 4.70 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 4.5 |
| Thu 10/7 | vs Coastal Carolina | L 20-52 | 6 | 29 | 4.80 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 4 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Georgia Southern | L 33-59 | 7 | 54 | 7.70 | 0 | 3 | 25 | 7.9 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Tulsa | L 34-41 | 8 | 20 | 2.50 | 0 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Washington | L 3-52 | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | 7 | 69 | 7.6 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Memphis | L 50-55 | 6 | 36 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 40 | 7.6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas State
2020-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Texas State
2022-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20202021202220232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 535 | 65.1 | 15.3 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 731 | 49.4 | 22.5 | 196 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas State | 989 | 41.1 | 30.9 | 258 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas State | 0 | — | — | -989 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas State | 681 | 54.1 | 14.2 | 681 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas State | 681 | 54.1 | 14.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas State | 1,440 | 56.5 | 30.6 | 759 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas State | 1,440 | 56.5 | 30.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisiana
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
224
Primary metric
224 scrimmage yards and 58 usage.
#2
Eastern Michigan
187
Primary metric
Win with 187 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
187 scrimmage yards and 22.8 usage.
#3
North Texas
175
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
175 scrimmage yards and 35.7 usage.
#4
Louisiana
133
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
133 scrimmage yards and 36.9 usage.
#5
Louisiana
139
Primary metric
Loss with 139 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
139 scrimmage yards and 34 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas State
1,440 primary output · 56.5 efficiency · 30.6 usage
66.5
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas State
66.5
1,440 primary · 56.5 efficiency · 30.6 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Texas State
52.5
989 primary · 41.1 efficiency · 30.9 usage
Milestones
18
100+ rush yards
5
150+ scrimmage yards
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.7583
Houston · Germantown, TN
- Committed To
- Arkansas State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
4,376
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 56 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.