Usage Score
26.4
Player Profile
Eric McAlister
WR • 6'3" • 205 lbs • Azle, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Eric McAlister reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.5
Consistency
60.6
Season Value
67.6
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU
22222324242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Boise State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Eric McAlister, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU. Eric McAlister reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
TCU paired 1,190 primary output with 83.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Boise State, TCU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · TCU
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
99.2
Efficiency
83.5
Usage
26.4
Consistency
60.6
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 69. North Carolina: 20. Unknown: 46. SMU: 254. Colorado: 65. Kansas State: 156. Baylor: 62. West Virginia: 124. Iowa State: 107. BYU: 107. Houston: 79. Cincinnati: 101
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 8 by 57.5. North Carolina: 3 by 44.4. Unknown: 2 by 100. SMU: 8 by 100. Colorado: 4 by 100. Kansas State: 4 by 100. Baylor: 7 by 59. West Virginia: 9 by 91.9. Iowa State: 11 by 64.8. BYU: 4 by 100. Houston: 4 by 100. Cincinnati: 8 by 84.2
Split Comparison
Wins96.8 · n=8 · -26.6 vs Losses
Losses123.3 · n=3 · +26.6 vs Wins
First Half101.7 · n=6 · +5 vs Second Half
Second Half96.7 · n=6 · -5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | vs USCHigh volume | W 30-27 | — | 8 | 69 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Cincinnati100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-23 | — | 8 | 101 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Houston | W 17-14 | — | 4 | 79 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 1 | 37 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ BYU100 receiving yards | L 13-44 | — | 4 | 107 | 26.8 | 26.80 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Iowa State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-20 | — | 11 | 107 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ West Virginia100 receiving yards · High volume | W 23-17 | — | 9 | 124 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Baylor | W 42-36 | — | 7 | 62 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Kansas State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 28-41 | — | 4 | 156 | 39 | 39 | 2 | 85 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Colorado2+ TD | W 35-21 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 2 | 23 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs SMU100 receiving yards · High volume | W 35-24 | — | 8 | 254 | 31.8 | 31.80 | 3 | 70 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 46 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 33 |
| Tue 9/2 | @ North Carolina | W 48-14 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Boise State
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
TCU
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2022202220232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Postseason | Boise State | 259 | 98.1 | 11.6 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Boise State | 259 | 98.1 | 11.6 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Boise State | 873 | 91.5 | 29.8 | 614 |
| 2024 Postseason | TCU | 762 | 94 | 14.4 | -111 |
| 2024 Regular Season | TCU | 762 | 94 | 14.4 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | TCU | 1,190 | 83.5 | 26.4 | 428 |
| 2025 Regular Season | TCU | 1,190 | 83.5 | 26.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wyoming
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
160
Primary metric
160 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
San José State
170
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
170 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
SMU
254
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
254 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
SMU
114
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Nevada
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · TCU
1,190 primary output · 83.5 efficiency · 26.4 usage
67.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · TCU
67.6
1,190 primary · 83.5 efficiency · 26.4 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Boise State
67
873 primary · 91.5 efficiency · 29.8 usage
Milestones
11
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.8511
Queen Creek · Queen Creek, AZ
- Committed To
- Iowa State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,084
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.