Usage Score
29.8
Player Dossier
2022-2025TCU
WR • 6'3" • 205 lbs • Azle, TX, USA
Eric McAlister reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
29.8
Efficiency
91.5
Consistency
69.6
Season Value
67
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eric McAlister, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU. Eric McAlister reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
TCU paired 1,190 primary output with 83.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 91.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Boise State, TCU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
97
Efficiency
91.5
Usage
29.8
Consistency
69.6
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 69. UCF: 26. Unknown: 143. San Diego State: 90. Memphis: 98. San José State: 170. Colorado State: 32. Wyoming: 160. Fresno State: 85
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 7 by 65.7. UCF: 2 by 86.7. Unknown: 6 by 100. San Diego State: 5 by 100. Memphis: 5 by 100. San José State: 5 by 100. Colorado State: 2 by 100. Wyoming: 7 by 100. Fresno State: 8 by 70.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wyoming
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/5 | @ Fresno StateHigh volume | L 30-37 | — | 8 | 85 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Wyoming100 receiving yards | W 32-7 | — | 7 | 160 | 22.9 | 22.90 | 1 | 49 |
| Sun 10/15 | @ Colorado State | L 30-31 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 10/8 | vs San José State100 receiving yards | W 35-27 | — | 5 | 170 | 34 | 34 | 1 | 83 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Memphis | L 32-35 | — | 5 | 98 | 19.6 | 19.60 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ San Diego State | W 34-31 | — | 5 | 90 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 6 | 143 | 23.8 | 23.80 | 2 | 34 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs UCF | L 16-18 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Washington | L 19-56 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 19 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Boise State
2022-2023
Opening stop
TCU
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Postseason | Boise State | 259 | 98.1 | 11.6 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Boise State | 259 | 98.1 | 11.6 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Boise State | 873 | 91.5 | 29.8 | 614 |
| 2024 Postseason | TCU | 762 | 94 | 14.4 | -111 |
| 2024 Regular Season | TCU | 762 | 94 | 14.4 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | TCU | 1,190 | 83.5 | 26.4 | 428 |
| 2025 Regular Season | TCU | 1,190 | 83.5 | 26.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Wyoming
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
160
Primary metric
160 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
San José State
170
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
170 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
SMU
254
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
254 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
SMU
114
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Nevada
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · TCU
1,190 primary output · 83.5 efficiency · 26.4 usage
67.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · TCU
67.6
1,190 primary · 83.5 efficiency · 26.4 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Boise State
67
873 primary · 91.5 efficiency · 29.8 usage
11
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2026 · Rating 0.8511
Queen Creek · Queen Creek, AZ
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,084
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Eric McAlister quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit