Usage Score
6.4
Player Dossier
2022-2025Oklahoma State
Kendal Daniels
LB • 6'5" • 242 lbs • Beggs, OK, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Kendal Daniels shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
28.1
Consistency
30.9
Season Value
19.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
222323242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Oklahoma State • Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Colorado
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kendal Daniels, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Oklahoma State. Kendal Daniels shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Oklahoma State paired 23 primary output with 41.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 28.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oklahoma State, Oklahoma.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
28.1
Usage
6.4
Consistency
30.9
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 0. Unknown: 1.5. Michigan: 2.5. Temple: 0. Auburn: 0.5. Kent State: 0. Texas: 2. South Carolina: 3. Ole Miss: 3.5. Tennessee: 0. Alabama: 0. Missouri: 1. LSU: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 4 by 16.7. Unknown: 3 by 27.5. Michigan: 4 by 41.7. Temple: 1 by 4.2. Auburn: 5 by 25.8. Kent State: 1 by 4.2. Texas: 6 by 45. South Carolina: 6 by 55. Ole Miss: 6 by 60. Tennessee: 3 by 12.5. Alabama: 1 by 4.2. Missouri: 7 by 39.2. LSU: 7 by 29.2
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=9 · -1.1 vs Losses
Losses1.8 · n=3 · +1.1 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · n=6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Best efficiency game
60 vs Ole Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Alabama | L 24-34 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs LSU | W 17-13 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Missouri | W 17-6 | 7 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Alabama | W 23-21 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Tennessee | W 33-27 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Ole MissSplash game | L 26-34 | 6 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ South CarolinaSplash game | W 26-7 | 6 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ TexasSplash game | L 6-23 | 6 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Kent State | W 44-0 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Auburn | W 24-17 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Temple | W 42-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs MichiganSplash game | W 24-13 | 4 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma State
2022-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Oklahoma
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202220232023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 11.5 | 33.5 | 7.1 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 10.5 | 38.8 | 11 | -1 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 10.5 | 38.8 | 11 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 23 | 41.4 | 12.6 | 12.5 |
| 2025 Postseason | Oklahoma | 14 | 28.1 | 6.4 | -9 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 14 | 28.1 | 6.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Colorado
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 63.3 takeover score.
#2
Texas A&M
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 62 takeover score.
#3
Ole Miss
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57.4 takeover score.
#4
Iowa State
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 55.1 takeover score.
#5
Texas Tech
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
23 primary output · 41.4 efficiency · 12.6 usage
34.1
#2
2023 Postseason · Oklahoma State
21.4
10.5 primary · 38.8 efficiency · 11 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
21.4
10.5 primary · 38.8 efficiency · 11 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
10
Splash games
7
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9578
Beggs · Beggs, OK
- Committed To
- Oklahoma State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
292
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 51 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.