Usage Score
28.7
Player Profile
WR • 6'0" • 205 lbs • Peachtree City, GA, USA
Dane Kinamon reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
28.7
Efficiency
62.7
Consistency
17.7
Season Value
38.9
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Air Force
Quick Facts
Dane Kinamon, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Air Force. Dane Kinamon reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Air Force paired 88 primary output with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 62.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
18
Efficiency
62.7
Usage
28.7
Consistency
17.7
Best Game by takeover score
James Madison
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. James Madison: 0. Sam Houston: 0. Utah State: 7. San José State: 6. Navy: 94. Colorado State: 9. Army: 10
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 1 by 46.7. San José State: 1 by 40. Navy: 1 by 100. Colorado State: 1 by 60. Army: 1 by 66.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
100 vs Navy
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Air Force
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Air Force | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Air Force | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Air Force | 141 | 88.1 | 33.5 | 141 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Air Force | 141 | 88.1 | 33.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Air Force | 88 | 76.7 | 66.7 | -53 |
| 2023 Postseason | Air Force | 126 | 62.7 | 28.7 | 38 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Air Force | 126 | 62.7 | 28.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
80
Primary metric
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Army
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Navy
94
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisville
40
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#5
Colorado
8
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Air Force
88 primary output · 76.7 efficiency · 66.7 usage
58
#2
2019 Postseason · Air Force
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Air Force
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
355
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Dane Kinamon quick answers