Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2023-2024North Carolina
Alijah Huzzie
DB • 5'10" • 195 lbs • Franklin, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Alijah Huzzie shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25 disruption score.
Efficiency
25
Consistency
56.5
Season Value
30
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · North Carolina
232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- North Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alijah Huzzie, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · North Carolina. Alijah Huzzie shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
North Carolina paired 15 primary output with 25 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 25 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · North Carolina
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
25
Usage
5.2
Consistency
56.5
Best Game by takeover score
UConn
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UConn: 0. Minnesota: 1. Unknown: 1. James Madison: 0. Duke: 4. Pittsburgh: 1.5. Georgia Tech: 1. Virginia: 2. Florida State: 1. Wake Forest: 1.5. Boston College: 0. NC State: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UConn: 1 by 4.2. Minnesota: 6 by 35. Unknown: 2 by 18.3. James Madison: 3 by 12.5. Duke: 0 by 40. Pittsburgh: 5 by 35.8. Georgia Tech: 0 by 10. Virginia: 2 by 28.3. Florida State: 3 by 22.5. Wake Forest: 8 by 48.3. Boston College: 3 by 12.5. NC State: 3 by 32.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.4 · Games = 4 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses1.2 · Games = 7 · -0.2 vs Wins
First Half1.3 · Games = 6 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · Games = 6 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Duke
Best efficiency game
48.3 vs Wake Forest
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | vs UConn | L 14-27 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs NC State | L 30-35 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Boston College | L 21-41 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/17 | vs Wake Forest | W 31-24 | 8 | 6 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Florida State | W 35-11 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Virginia | W 41-14 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Georgia Tech | L 34-41 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Pittsburgh | L 24-34 | 5 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Duke | L 20-21 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs James Madison | L 50-70 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Minnesota | W 19-17 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
North Carolina
2023-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | North Carolina | 10 | 25 | 5.4 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | North Carolina | 15 | 25 | 5.2 | 5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | North Carolina | 15 | 25 | 5.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 74.6 takeover score.
#2
Mississippi State
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 66.3 takeover score.
#3
Pittsburgh
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.8 takeover score.
#4
Duke
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 46.7 takeover score.
#5
South Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 42.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · North Carolina
15 primary output · 25 efficiency · 5.2 usage
30
#2
2024 Regular Season · North Carolina
30
15 primary · 25 efficiency · 5.2 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · North Carolina
26.9
10 primary · 25 efficiency · 5.4 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
78
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.