Usage Score
21.3
Player Dossier
2019-2024UTEP
Deion Hankins
RB • 6'0" • 225 lbs • El Paso, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Deion Hankins leans balanced backfield option traits and 41.3 efficiency.
Efficiency
47.8
Consistency
61.5
Season Value
53.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · UTEP
1920212122232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- UTEP • Texas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Deion Hankins, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · UTEP. Deion Hankins leans balanced backfield option traits and 41.3 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
UTEP paired 883 primary output with 50.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 47.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UTEP, Texas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic
Win with 138 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
61.9
Efficiency
47.8
Usage
21.3
Consistency
61.5
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 15. North Texas: 27. New Mexico State: 6. New Mexico: 46. Boise State: 86. Charlotte: 116. Louisiana Tech: 80. Florida Atlantic: 138. Middle Tennessee: 75. Rice: 42. Florida International: 81. UTSA: 31
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 6 by 26. North Texas: 8 by 35.2. New Mexico State: 4 by 15.6. New Mexico: 8 by 51.6. Boise State: 21 by 42.7. Charlotte: 21 by 58. Louisiana Tech: 15 by 50.8. Florida Atlantic: 17 by 83.8. Middle Tennessee: 14 by 55. Rice: 9 by 48.6. Florida International: 14 by 60.3. UTSA: 7 by 46.1
Split Comparison
Wins85.4 · n=5 · +40.3 vs Losses
Losses45.1 · n=7 · -40.3 vs Wins
First Half49.3 · n=6 · -25.2 vs Second Half
Second Half74.5 · n=6 · +25.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Best efficiency game
83.8 vs Florida Atlantic
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ UTSA | L 31-34 | 7 | 31 | 4.40 | 0 | — | — | 4.4 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Florida International | W 40-6 | 14 | 81 | 5.80 | 0 | — | — | 5.8 |
| Thu 11/3 | @ Rice | L 30-37 | 9 | 42 | 4.70 | 1 | — | — | 4.7 |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 13-24 | 13 | 68 | 5.20 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5.4 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Florida Atlantic100 rush yards | W 24-21 | 17 | 138 | 8.10 | 0 | — | — | 8.1 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 31-41 | 14 | 64 | 4.60 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Charlotte100 rush yards | W 41-35 | 20 | 112 | 5.60 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5.5 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Boise State | W 27-10 | 21 | 86 | 4.10 | 0 | — | — | 4.1 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ New Mexico | L 10-27 | 7 | 31 | 4.40 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 5.8 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs New Mexico State | W 20-13 | 4 | 6 | 1.50 | 0 | — | — | 1.5 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Oklahoma | L 13-45 | 6 | 15 | 2.50 | 0 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Sun 8/28 | vs North Texas | L 13-31 | 8 | 27 | 3.40 | 0 | — | — | 3.4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2019-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Texas State
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
20192020202120212022202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 41 | 52.1 | 4.6 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTEP | 595 | 49.3 | 32.8 | 554 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTEP | 482 | 40.1 | 24.3 | -113 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTEP | 482 | 40.1 | 24.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTEP | 743 | 47.8 | 21.3 | 261 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTEP | 883 | 50.2 | 25.8 | 140 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas State | 272 | 41.3 | 9.9 | -611 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas State | 272 | 41.3 | 9.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game driven by a workhorse rushing load.
185
Primary metric
185 scrimmage yards and 41.7 usage.
#2
Florida Atlantic
138
Primary metric
Win with 138 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
138 scrimmage yards and 29.8 usage.
#3
UL Monroe
117
Primary metric
Win with 117 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
117 scrimmage yards and 25.8 usage.
#4
Charlotte
119
Primary metric
Loss with 119 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
119 scrimmage yards and 31.6 usage.
#5
Unknown
113
Primary metric
Game with 113 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
113 scrimmage yards and 31.5 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · UTEP
883 primary output · 50.2 efficiency · 25.8 usage
59
#2
2020 Regular Season · UTEP
56.5
595 primary · 49.3 efficiency · 32.8 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · UTEP
53.5
743 primary · 47.8 efficiency · 21.3 usage
Milestones
9
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8704
East St. Louis · East St. Louis, IL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
3,016
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 55 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.