Usage Score
33.7
Player Dossier
2019-2023Arizona
Jacob Cowing
WR • 5'11" • 175 lbs • Maricopa, AZ, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Jacob Cowing reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
91.7
Consistency
77.3
Season Value
62.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · UTEP
19202121222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- UTEP • Arizona
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jacob Cowing, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · UTEP. Jacob Cowing reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
UTEP paired 1,354 primary output with 89.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 91.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UTEP, Arizona.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
86.4
Efficiency
91.7
Usage
33.7
Consistency
77.3
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 116. Texas: 49. Unknown: 110. UL Monroe: 102. Louisiana Tech: 63. Charlotte: 75. UTSA: 58. North Texas: 118
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 7 by 100. Texas: 4 by 81.7. Unknown: 8 by 91.7. UL Monroe: 3 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 60. Charlotte: 5 by 100. UTSA: 2 by 100. North Texas: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses72.6 · Games = 5
First Half94.3 · Games = 4 · +15.8 vs Second Half
Second Half78.5 · Games = 4 · -15.8 vs First Half
All Games86.4 · Games = 8
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/11 | vs North Texas100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 43-45 | — | 5 | 118 | 23.6 | 23.60 | 2 | 47 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ UTSA | L 21-52 | — | 2 | 58 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Charlotte | L 28-38 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 17-21 | — | 7 | 63 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ UL Monroe100 receiving yards | W 31-6 | — | 3 | 102 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 82 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 8 | 110 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 51 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ Texas | L 3-59 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 7 | 116 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 0 | 30 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2019-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Arizona
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
2019202020212021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 550 | 87.3 | 17.5 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTEP | 691 | 91.7 | 33.7 | 141 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTEP | 1,354 | 89.3 | 34.2 | 663 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTEP | 1,354 | 89.3 | 34.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Arizona | 1,026 | 72.7 | 30.3 | -328 |
| 2023 Postseason | Arizona | 839 | 55.8 | 27 | -187 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Arizona | 839 | 55.8 | 27 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
118
Primary metric
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico
174
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
174 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rice
170
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
170 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
166
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
166 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Charlotte
145
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
145 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · UTEP
1,354 primary output · 89.3 efficiency · 34.2 usage
71.9
#2
2021 Regular Season · UTEP
71.9
1,354 primary · 89.3 efficiency · 34.2 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · UTEP
62.9
691 primary · 91.7 efficiency · 33.7 usage
Milestones
19
100+ receiving yards
13
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.7683
Maricopa · Maricopa, AZ
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
4,460
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 57 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.