Usage Score
3.2
Player Dossier
2017-2019UTEP
Dakari Bickham
DE • 6'3" • 280 lbs • Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Dakari Bickham shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 7.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
7.2
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
7.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · UTEP
171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Liberty
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dakari Bickham, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · UTEP. Dakari Bickham shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 7.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
UTEP paired 0.5 primary output with 7.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 7.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Liberty
Game with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
3
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
7.2
Usage
3.2
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Liberty: 0.5. Southern Miss: 0. BYU: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Liberty: 2 by 13.3. Southern Miss: 2 by 8.3. BYU: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
First Half0.3 · n=2
All Games0.2 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Liberty
Best efficiency game
13.3 vs Liberty
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 0.5 | 7.2 | 3.2 | 0.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Liberty
Game with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5
Primary metric
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 31.7 takeover score.
#2
Rice
0.5
Primary metric
Loss with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 22.1 takeover score.
#3
BYU
0
Primary metric
Game with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 4.2 takeover score.
#4
Southern Miss
0
Primary metric
Game with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 4.2 takeover score.
#5
Charlotte
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · UTEP
0.5 primary output · 7.2 efficiency · 3.2 usage
7.9
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
4
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.