Usage Score
21.4
Player Dossier
2017-2020Buffalo
Daniel Lee
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Breaux Bridge, LA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Daniel Lee reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.7
Consistency
61.7
Season Value
64.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Buffalo
1718191920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Daniel Lee, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Buffalo. Daniel Lee reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Buffalo paired 284 primary output with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Buffalo
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
31.6
Efficiency
76.7
Usage
21.4
Consistency
61.7
Best Game by takeover score
Charlotte
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Charlotte: 6. Penn State: 11. Liberty: 16. Akron: 30. Central Michigan: 14. Eastern Michigan: 67. Kent State: 58. Toledo: 47. Bowling Green: 35
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Charlotte: 1 by 40. Penn State: 1 by 73.3. Liberty: 1 by 100. Akron: 6 by 33.3. Central Michigan: 2 by 46.7. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 100. Kent State: 4 by 96.7. Toledo: 3 by 100. Bowling Green: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins33.2 · n=6 · +4.8 vs Losses
Losses28.3 · n=3 · -4.8 vs Wins
First Half15.4 · n=5 · -36.4 vs Second Half
Second Half51.8 · n=4 · +36.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/20 | @ Charlotte | W 31-9 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Bowling Green | W 49-7 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Thu 11/21 | vs Toledo | W 49-30 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Fri 11/15 | @ Kent State | L 27-30 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 43-14 | — | 3 | 67 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Central Michigan | W 43-20 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Akron | W 21-0 | — | 6 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Liberty | L 17-35 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Penn State | L 13-45 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172018201920192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Buffalo | 284 | 76.7 | 21.4 | 284 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Buffalo | 284 | 76.7 | 21.4 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | -284 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58
Primary metric
58 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
67
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Toledo
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
35
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Liberty
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Buffalo
284 primary output · 76.7 efficiency · 21.4 usage
64.9
#2
2019 Regular Season · Buffalo
64.9
284 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 21.4 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Buffalo
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
284
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 9 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.