Usage Score
26.8
Player Dossier
2019-2024Michigan
WR • 6'0" • 185 lbs • Stuart, FL, USA
George Johnson III reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
26.8
Efficiency
81.1
Consistency
68.5
Season Value
67.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
George Johnson III, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Michigan. George Johnson III reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Michigan paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Massachusetts, Florida Atlantic.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
36.5
Efficiency
81.1
Usage
26.8
Consistency
68.5
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulane: 11. Toledo: 0. Unknown: 48. Temple: 19. Eastern Michigan: 66. Liberty: 24. Buffalo: 52. New Mexico State: 34. UConn: 38. Arkansas State: 72. Army: 38
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulane: 1 by 73.3. Unknown: 6 by 53.3. Temple: 2 by 63.3. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 100. Liberty: 2 by 80. Buffalo: 2 by 100. New Mexico State: 4 by 56.7. UConn: 3 by 84.4. Arkansas State: 2 by 100. Army: 2 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Army
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs Army | L 7-44 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Arkansas State | L 33-35 | — | 2 | 72 | 36 | 36 | 1 | 53 |
| Fri 11/4 | @ UConn | L 10-27 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs New Mexico State | L 13-23 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Buffalo | L 7-34 | — | 2 | 52 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Liberty | L 24-42 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 13-20 | — | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Temple | L 0-28 | — | 2 | 19 | 7.3 | 9.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 48 | 6.4 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Toledo | L 10-55 | — | — | — | -1.5 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Tulane | L 10-42 | — | 1 | 11 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2019-2021
Opening stop
Massachusetts
2022-2023
Peak year stop
Florida Atlantic
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 402 | 81.1 | 26.8 | 402 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 421 | 80.4 | 17 | 19 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 85 | 53 | 9.4 | -336 |
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66
Primary metric
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arkansas State
72
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 71.1 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Michigan
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2023 Regular Season · Massachusetts
69.5
421 primary · 80.4 efficiency · 17 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Massachusetts
67.7
402 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 26.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8641
Martin County · Stuart, FL
Career Facts
3
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
908
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
George Johnson III quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit