Usage Score
35.9
Player Dossier
2020-2024Nebraska
WR • 6'4" • 220 lbs • Bethesda, MD, USA
Jahmal Banks reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
35.9
Efficiency
70.4
Consistency
71.6
Season Value
68.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Wake Forest
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jahmal Banks, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Wake Forest. Jahmal Banks reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Wake Forest paired 653 primary output with 70.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Wake Forest, Nebraska.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
59.4
Efficiency
70.4
Usage
35.9
Consistency
71.6
Best Game by takeover score
Syracuse
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 108. Vanderbilt: 34. Old Dominion: 81. Georgia Tech: 53. Clemson: 55. Virginia Tech: 43. Pittsburgh: 59. Florida State: 43. Duke: 52. Notre Dame: 35. Syracuse: 90
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 6 by 100. Vanderbilt: 4 by 56.7. Old Dominion: 8 by 67.5. Georgia Tech: 6 by 58.9. Clemson: 8 by 45.8. Virginia Tech: 4 by 71.7. Pittsburgh: 2 by 100. Florida State: 4 by 71.7. Duke: 5 by 69.3. Notre Dame: 5 by 46.7. Syracuse: 7 by 85.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ Syracuse | L 31-35 | — | 7 | 90 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Notre Dame | L 7-45 | — | 5 | 35 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 11/2 | @ Duke | L 21-24 | — | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Florida State | L 16-41 | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Pittsburgh | W 21-17 | — | 2 | 59 | 22 | 29.50 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Virginia Tech | L 13-30 | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ ClemsonHigh volume | L 12-17 | — | 8 | 55 | 6.9 | 6.90 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Georgia Tech | L 16-30 | — | 6 | 53 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Old DominionHigh volume | W 27-24 | — | 8 | 81 | 10.1 | 10.10 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Vanderbilt | W 36-20 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 1 | 15 |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 6 | 108 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 33 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wake Forest
2020-2023
Opening stop
Nebraska
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 17 | 100 | 6.3 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 98 | 93.3 | 7.5 | 81 |
| 2022 Postseason | Wake Forest | 636 | 85.5 | 15.2 | 538 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 636 | 85.5 | 15.2 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 653 | 70.4 | 35.9 | 17 |
| 2024 Postseason | Nebraska | 587 | 80.3 | 15.3 | -66 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Nebraska | 587 | 80.3 | 15.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
108
Primary metric
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Clemson
141
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Purdue
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Duke
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Illinois
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 78.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Wake Forest
653 primary output · 70.4 efficiency · 35.9 usage
68.3
#2
2022 Postseason · Wake Forest
64
636 primary · 85.5 efficiency · 15.2 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Wake Forest
64
636 primary · 85.5 efficiency · 15.2 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2026 · Rating 0.8853
Woodlawn · Birmingham, AL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,991
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jahmal Banks quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit