Usage Score
9.4
Player Dossier
2019-2023Tennessee
LB • 6'1" • 225 lbs • Franklin, GA, USA
Aaron Beasley shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
9.4
Efficiency
34.8
Consistency
24.5
Season Value
22.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Aaron Beasley, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Tennessee. Aaron Beasley shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.8 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Tennessee paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 34.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
34.8
Usage
9.4
Consistency
24.5
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 0. Virginia: 3. Unknown: 7. Florida: 1. UTSA: 0.5. South Carolina: 2. Texas A&M: 0. Alabama: 0. Kentucky: 0. UConn: 1.5. Missouri: 0.5. Georgia: 3. Vanderbilt: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 2 by 8.3. Virginia: 3 by 42.5. Unknown: 9 by 87.5. Florida: 8 by 43.3. UTSA: 9 by 42.5. South Carolina: 4 by 36.7. Texas A&M: 5 by 20.8. Alabama: 7 by 29.2. Kentucky: 3 by 12.5. UConn: 3 by 27.5. Missouri: 3 by 17.5. Georgia: 9 by 67.5. Vanderbilt: 4 by 16.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | vs Iowa | W 35-0 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Vanderbilt | W 48-24 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs GeorgiaSplash game | L 10-38 | 9 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Missouri | L 7-36 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs UConn | W 59-3 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Kentucky | W 33-27 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Alabama | L 20-34 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Texas A&M | W 20-13 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs South Carolina | W 41-20 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs UTSA | W 45-14 | 9 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Florida | L 16-29 | 8 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown2+ sacks · Splash game | — | 9 | 8 | — | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Virginia | W 49-13 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tennessee
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Tennessee | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0.5 | 11.4 | 2.7 | 0.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Tennessee | 9 | 33.2 | 7.6 | 8.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Tennessee | 9 | 33.2 | 7.6 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Tennessee | 16 | 35.5 | 12.5 | 7 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tennessee | 16 | 35.5 | 12.5 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Tennessee | 18.5 | 34.8 | 9.4 | 2.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Tennessee | 18.5 | 34.8 | 9.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 70.1 takeover score.
#2
Clemson
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.1 takeover score.
#3
South Carolina
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61.4 takeover score.
#4
Ole Miss
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 58 takeover score.
#5
Vanderbilt
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 49.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Tennessee
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
35
#2
2019 Regular Season · Tennessee
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Tennessee
26.1
16 primary · 35.5 efficiency · 12.5 usage
3
Impact games
4
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8828
Fulshear · Fulshear, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
228
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Aaron Beasley quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit