Usage Score
5.4
Player Dossier
2019-2023Toledo
Dalton Andrews
TE • 6'2" • 255 lbs • Pemberville, OH, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Dalton Andrews reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
43.4
Consistency
67.7
Season Value
51.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Toledo
1920212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dalton Andrews, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Toledo. Dalton Andrews reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Toledo paired 26 primary output with 43.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 43.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Toledo
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
6.5
Efficiency
43.4
Usage
5.4
Consistency
67.7
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 3. Western Michigan: 9. Northern Illinois: 4. Eastern Michigan: 10
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 20. Western Michigan: 1 by 60. Northern Illinois: 1 by 26.7. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Wins7.7 · n=3
First Half6 · n=2 · -1 vs Second Half
Second Half7 · n=2 · +1 vs First Half
All Games6.5 · n=4
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Eastern Michigan
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
20192020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Toledo | 26 | 43.4 | 5.4 | 26 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
10
Primary metric
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#3
Northern Illinois
4
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
3 receiving yards with a 20 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Toledo
26 primary output · 43.4 efficiency · 5.4 usage
51.5
#2
2019 Regular Season · Toledo
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Toledo
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
26
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 4 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.