Usage Score
6.9
Player Dossier
2019-2024Toledo
D'Andre Ragin
DE • 6'2" • 252 lbs • Miami, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
D'Andre Ragin shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
24.1
Consistency
54.7
Season Value
29.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Toledo
192021212223232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
D'Andre Ragin, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Toledo. D'Andre Ragin shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Toledo paired 13 primary output with 24.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 24.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Toledo
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1
Efficiency
24.1
Usage
6.9
Consistency
54.7
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 2. Unknown: 0. Massachusetts: 0.5. Mississippi State: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Buffalo: 2. Northern Illinois: 2. Bowling Green: 2. Eastern Michigan: 1.5. Central Michigan: 2. Ohio: 1. Akron: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 3 by 32.5. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Massachusetts: 4 by 21.7. Mississippi State: 1 by 4.2. Western Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Miami (OH): 1 by 4.2. Buffalo: 4 by 36.7. Northern Illinois: 2 by 28.3. Bowling Green: 4 by 36.7. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 40. Central Michigan: 3 by 32.5. Ohio: 8 by 43.3. Akron: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Wins1.1 · n=7 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=5 · -0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · n=7 · -0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · n=6 · +0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
43.3 vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/26 | vs Pittsburgh | W 48-46 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/27 | @ Akron | L 14-21 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/21 | vs Ohio | L 7-24 | 8 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/13 | vs Central Michigan | W 37-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 29-28 | 6 | 1 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Bowling Green | L 26-41 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Northern Illinois | W 13-6 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Buffalo | L 15-30 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Miami (OH) | W 30-20 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Western Kentucky | L 21-26 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Mississippi State | W 41-17 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Massachusetts | W 38-23 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2019-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
201920202021202120222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Toledo | 1 | 13.3 | 1.5 | 1 |
| 2021 Postseason | Toledo | 7 | 15 | 4.5 | 6 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Toledo | 7 | 15 | 4.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Toledo | 2 | 10.3 | 2.3 | -5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Toledo | 12.5 | 24.3 | 7.9 | 10.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Toledo | 12.5 | 24.3 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Toledo | 13 | 24.1 | 6.9 | 0.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Toledo | 13 | 24.1 | 6.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 61.6 takeover score.
#2
Massachusetts
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57 takeover score.
#3
San José State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.4 takeover score.
#4
Ohio
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51 takeover score.
#5
Bowling Green
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Toledo
13 primary output · 24.1 efficiency · 6.9 usage
29.2
#2
2024 Regular Season · Toledo
29.2
13 primary · 24.1 efficiency · 6.9 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Toledo
23.7
12.5 primary · 24.3 efficiency · 7.9 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8431
St. Thomas Aquinas · Opa Locka, FL
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
115
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.