Usage Score
5.6
Player Dossier
2017-2020Louisiana
WR • 6'4" • 206 lbs • Lake Charles, LA, USA
Brian Smith Jr. reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
5.6
Efficiency
68.7
Consistency
72.3
Season Value
61.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Louisiana
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brian Smith Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Louisiana. Brian Smith Jr. reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Louisiana paired 74 primary output with 68.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 68.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
14.8
Efficiency
68.7
Usage
5.6
Consistency
72.3
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 7. Unknown: 23. Ohio: 16. Coastal Carolina: 20. Troy: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 1 by 46.7. Unknown: 2 by 76.7. Ohio: 1 by 100. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 66.7. Troy: 1 by 53.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Louisiana
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Louisiana | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisiana | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Louisiana | 74 | 68.7 | 5.6 | 74 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Louisiana | 0 | — | — | -74 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
23
Primary metric
23 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio
16
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Coastal Carolina
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
Troy
8
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#5
Mississippi State
7
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Louisiana
74 primary output · 68.7 efficiency · 5.6 usage
61.3
#2
2017 Regular Season · Louisiana
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Louisiana
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
74
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Brian Smith Jr. quick answers