Usage Score
29.2
Player Dossier
2019-2024Rice
WR • 5'10" • 188 lbs • San Clemente, CA, USA
Jake Bailey reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
29.2
Efficiency
76.6
Consistency
59.1
Season Value
65.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Rice
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jake Bailey, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Rice. Jake Bailey reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Rice paired 714 primary output with 76.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Rice, SMU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
64.9
Efficiency
76.6
Usage
29.2
Consistency
59.1
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas: 47. Houston: 15. Texas: 22. Unknown: 65. Southern Miss: 83. UTSA: 13. UAB: 45. North Texas: 143. Charlotte: 143. Western Kentucky: 80. UTEP: 58
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas: 4 by 78.3. Houston: 1 by 100. Texas: 4 by 36.7. Unknown: 7 by 61.9. Southern Miss: 5 by 100. UTSA: 2 by 43.3. UAB: 6 by 50. North Texas: 10 by 95.3. Charlotte: 7 by 100. Western Kentucky: 5 by 100. UTEP: 5 by 77.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/20 | @ UTEP | L 28-38 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Western Kentucky | L 21-42 | — | 5 | 80 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Charlotte100 receiving yards | L 24-31 | — | 7 | 143 | 20.4 | 20.40 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs North Texas100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-30 | — | 10 | 143 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ UAB | W 30-24 | — | 6 | 45 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ UTSA | L 0-45 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Southern Miss | W 24-19 | — | 5 | 83 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 65 | 9.9 | 9.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/19 | @ Texas | L 0-58 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Houston | L 7-44 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Arkansas | L 17-38 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 20 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2019-2021
Opening stop
SMU
2022-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Rice | 53 | 44.9 | 11.7 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Rice | 276 | 78.6 | 32.1 | 223 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Rice | 714 | 76.6 | 29.2 | 438 |
| 2022 Regular Season | SMU | 205 | 85 | 21.7 | -509 |
| 2023 Postseason | SMU | 528 | 78.6 | 14.5 | 323 |
| 2023 Regular Season | SMU | 528 | 78.6 | 14.5 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | SMU | 275 | 77.2 | 16.8 | -253 |
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
143
Primary metric
143 receiving yards with a 95.3 efficiency score.
#2
Charlotte
143
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
TCU
163
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
163 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
North Texas
80
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Rice
714 primary output · 76.6 efficiency · 29.2 usage
65.6
#2
2020 Regular Season · Rice
57.3
276 primary · 78.6 efficiency · 32.1 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · SMU
55.7
528 primary · 78.6 efficiency · 14.5 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8647
Gunter · Gunter, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,051
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jake Bailey quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit