Usage Score
29
Player Dossier
2017-2023NC State
WR • 6'4" • 200 lbs • Needville, TX, USA
Bradley Rozner reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
29
Efficiency
80.5
Consistency
56.2
Season Value
64.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Rice
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bradley Rozner, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Rice. Bradley Rozner reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Rice paired 770 primary output with 80.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Rice, NC State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
64.2
Efficiency
80.5
Usage
29
Consistency
56.2
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 6. Wake Forest: 103. Texas: 41. Baylor: 100. Louisiana Tech: 64. UAB: 27. UTSA: 138. Southern Miss: 45. Marshall: 27. Middle Tennessee: 130. North Texas: 70. UTEP: 19
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 1 by 40. Wake Forest: 6 by 100. Texas: 1 by 100. Baylor: 7 by 95.2. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 85.3. UAB: 3 by 60. UTSA: 9 by 100. Southern Miss: 5 by 60. Marshall: 2 by 90. Middle Tennessee: 8 by 100. North Texas: 5 by 93.3. UTEP: 3 by 42.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
100 vs Middle Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ UTEP | W 30-16 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs North Texas | W 20-14 | — | 5 | 70 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Middle Tennessee100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-28 | — | 8 | 130 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 3 | 34 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Marshall | L 7-20 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Southern Miss | L 6-20 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ UTSA100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-31 | — | 9 | 138 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 55 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ UAB | L 20-35 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 20-23 | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Baylor100 receiving yards | L 13-21 | — | 7 | 100 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 9/15 | vs Texas | L 13-48 | — | 1 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Wake Forest100 receiving yards | L 21-41 | — | 6 | 103 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 0 | 40 |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Army | L 7-14 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2017-2022
Opening stop
NC State
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Rice | 770 | 80.5 | 29 | 770 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | -770 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Rice | 30 | 100 | 11.8 | 30 |
| 2022 Postseason | Rice | 876 | 85.1 | 19.4 | 846 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Rice | 876 | 85.1 | 19.4 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | NC State | 208 | 74.3 | 10.6 | -668 |
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
138
Primary metric
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Middle Tennessee
130
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
135
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTEP
142
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arkansas
30
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Rice
770 primary output · 80.5 efficiency · 29 usage
64.1
#2
2022 Postseason · Rice
63.5
876 primary · 85.1 efficiency · 19.4 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Rice
63.5
876 primary · 85.1 efficiency · 19.4 usage
9
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,884
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Bradley Rozner quick answers