Usage Score
29.8
Player Dossier
2019-2025UAB
Ryan Davis
WR • 5'11" • 181 lbs • Roswell, GA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Ryan Davis reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.6
Consistency
73.6
Season Value
68.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · New Mexico
192021212223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- UAB • New Mexico • Utah
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ryan Davis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · New Mexico. Ryan Davis reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
New Mexico paired 747 primary output with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across UAB, New Mexico, Utah.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Utah
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
65.9
Efficiency
75.6
Usage
29.8
Consistency
73.6
Best Game by takeover score
Nebraska
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 66. UCLA: 22. Unknown: 58. Wyoming: 91. Texas Tech: 70. West Virginia: 107. Arizona State: 68. BYU: 66. Colorado: 36. Cincinnati: 132. Baylor: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 5 by 88. UCLA: 3 by 48.9. Unknown: 6 by 64.4. Wyoming: 10 by 60.7. Texas Tech: 10 by 46.7. West Virginia: 7 by 100. Arizona State: 3 by 100. BYU: 7 by 62.9. Colorado: 2 by 100. Cincinnati: 8 by 100. Baylor: 1 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins66.4 · n=8 · -1.6 vs Losses
Losses68 · n=2 · +1.6 vs Wins
First Half69 · n=6 · +6.8 vs Second Half
Second Half62.2 · n=5 · -6.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
100 vs Cincinnati
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | vs Nebraska | W 44-22 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ Baylor | W 55-28 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/2 | vs Cincinnati100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-14 | — | 8 | 132 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 46 |
| Sun 10/26 | vs Colorado | W 53-7 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 10/19 | @ BYU | L 21-24 | — | 7 | 66 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 1 | 22 |
| Sun 10/12 | vs Arizona State | W 42-10 | — | 3 | 68 | 22.7 | 22.70 | 0 | 56 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ West Virginia100 receiving yards | W 48-14 | — | 7 | 107 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Texas TechHigh volume | L 10-34 | — | 10 | 70 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/14 | @ WyomingHigh volume | W 31-6 | — | 10 | 91 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 58 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 1 | 27 |
| Sun 8/31 | @ UCLA | W 43-10 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2019-2022
Opening stop
- 2
New Mexico
2023-2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Utah
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
201920202021202120222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | UAB | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | UAB | 45 | 86.7 | 12.8 | 45 |
| 2021 Postseason | UAB | 161 | 72.8 | 16.1 | 116 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UAB | 161 | 72.8 | 16.1 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UAB | 74 | 68.5 | 16.9 | -87 |
| 2023 Regular Season | New Mexico | 250 | 66.3 | 11.4 | 176 |
| 2024 Regular Season | New Mexico | 747 | 83.6 | 26 | 497 |
| 2025 Postseason | Utah | 725 | 75.6 | 29.8 | -22 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Utah | 725 | 75.6 | 29.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132
Primary metric
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Colorado State
146
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
146 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wyoming
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 98.3 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
51
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · New Mexico
747 primary output · 83.6 efficiency · 26 usage
69.6
#2
2025 Postseason · Utah
68.8
725 primary · 75.6 efficiency · 29.8 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Utah
68.8
725 primary · 75.6 efficiency · 29.8 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
3
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
2,002
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 44 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.