Usage Score
6.6
Player Dossier
2018-2022UTSA
Trevor Harmanson
LB • 6'3" • 225 lbs • Dickinson, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Trevor Harmanson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
24.3
Consistency
46.8
Season Value
22.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · UTSA
18192020212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trevor Harmanson, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · UTSA. Trevor Harmanson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
UTSA paired 14 primary output with 37 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 24.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · UTSA
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
24.3
Usage
6.6
Consistency
46.8
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 0. Houston: 1. Army: 1. Texas: 2. Unknown: 1. Middle Tennessee: 0.5. Western Kentucky: 0. Florida International: 1. North Texas: 0. UAB: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. Rice: 1. UTEP: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 6 by 25. Houston: 9 by 47.5. Army: 8 by 43.3. Texas: 4 by 36.7. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. Middle Tennessee: 7 by 34.2. Western Kentucky: 5 by 20.8. Florida International: 2 by 18.3. North Texas: 2 by 8.3. UAB: 2 by 8.3. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 8.3. Rice: 5 by 30.8. UTEP: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Wins0.4 · n=9 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=3 · +0.6 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · n=7 · +0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · n=6 · -0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
47.5 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/16 | @ Troy | L 12-18 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs UTEP | W 34-31 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | W 41-7 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 51-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ UAB | W 44-38 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas | W 31-27 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Florida International | W 30-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Western Kentucky | W 31-28 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/30 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 45-30 | 7 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/18 | @ TexasSplash game | L 20-41 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Army | W 41-38 | 8 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Houston | L 35-37 | 9 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
2018201920202020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 9.5 | 26.8 | 7.3 | 9.5 |
| 2020 Postseason | UTSA | 14 | 37 | 9.4 | 4.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 14 | 37 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 4.5 | 21.4 | 4.6 | -9.5 |
| 2022 Postseason | UTSA | 7.5 | 24.3 | 6.6 | 3 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 7.5 | 24.3 | 6.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 59.2 takeover score.
#2
Southern Miss
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.1 takeover score.
#4
Texas
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.4 takeover score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · UTSA
14 primary output · 37 efficiency · 9.4 usage
33.3
#2
2020 Regular Season · UTSA
33.3
14 primary · 37 efficiency · 9.4 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · UTSA
25.7
9.5 primary · 26.8 efficiency · 7.3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
5
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
235
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.