Usage Score
18
Player Dossier
2017-2021Kent State
Keshunn Abram
WR • 6'2" • 193 lbs • Southaven, MS, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Keshunn Abram reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67.5
Consistency
40
Season Value
56.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Kent State
171819202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Kent State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Keshunn Abram, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Kent State. Keshunn Abram reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Kent State paired 680 primary output with 67.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 67.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Kent State
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
48.6
Efficiency
67.5
Usage
18
Consistency
40
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 23. Texas A&M: 24. Unknown: 5. Iowa: 138. Maryland: 52. Bowling Green: 22. Buffalo: 74. Western Michigan: 18. Ohio: 27. Northern Illinois: 72. Central Michigan: 55. Akron: -4. Miami (OH): 138. Northern Illinois: 36
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 1 by 100. Texas A&M: 3 by 53.3. Unknown: 1 by 33.3. Iowa: 6 by 100. Maryland: 1 by 100. Bowling Green: 4 by 36.7. Buffalo: 2 by 100. Western Michigan: 2 by 60. Ohio: 3 by 60. Northern Illinois: 7 by 68.6. Central Michigan: 5 by 73.3. Akron: 1 by 0. Miami (OH): 7 by 100. Northern Illinois: 4 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins54.8 · n=6 · +5.4 vs Losses
Losses49.4 · n=7 · -5.4 vs Wins
First Half48.3 · n=7 · -0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half48.9 · n=7 · +0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wyoming
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/21 | @ Wyoming | L 38-52 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 12/4 | @ Northern Illinois | L 23-41 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Miami (OH)100 receiving yards | W 48-47 | — | 7 | 138 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 1 | 70 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Akron | W 38-0 | — | 1 | -4 | -4 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu 11/11 | @ Central Michigan | L 30-54 | — | 5 | 55 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 24 |
| Wed 11/3 | vs Northern Illinois | W 52-47 | — | 7 | 72 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Ohio | W 34-27 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Western Michigan | L 31-64 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Buffalo | W 48-38 | — | 2 | 74 | 37 | 37 | 0 | 54 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Bowling Green | W 27-20 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Maryland | L 16-37 | — | 1 | 52 | 52 | 52 | 0 | 52 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Iowa100 receiving yards | L 7-30 | — | 6 | 138 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 9/5 | @ Texas A&M | L 10-41 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kent State
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720182019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Kent State | 97 | 50.9 | 10.8 | 97 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Kent State | 39 | 100 | 4.4 | -58 |
| 2021 Postseason | Kent State | 680 | 67.5 | 18 | 641 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Kent State | 680 | 67.5 | 18 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
138
Primary metric
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami (OH)
138
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Bowling Green
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Akron
19
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Kent State
680 primary output · 67.5 efficiency · 18 usage
56.4
#2
2021 Regular Season · Kent State
56.4
680 primary · 67.5 efficiency · 18 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Kent State
52.3
39 primary · 100 efficiency · 4.4 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
816
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.