Usage Score
8.8
Player Dossier
2019-2023Tulane
Darius Hodges
DL • 6'2" • 280 lbs • Montgomery, AL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Darius Hodges shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
18.6
Consistency
13.9
Season Value
17
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Tulane
192020212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darius Hodges, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Tulane. Darius Hodges shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Tulane paired 22.5 primary output with 35.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 18.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
18.6
Usage
8.8
Consistency
13.9
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Massachusetts: 0. Kansas State: 0. Southern Miss: 0. Houston: 2. East Carolina: 0. South Florida: 0. Memphis: 0. Tulsa: 1. UCF: 1. SMU: 5. Cincinnati: 0. UCF: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Massachusetts: 2 by 8.3. Kansas State: 4 by 16.7. Southern Miss: 2 by 8.3. Houston: 1 by 24.2. East Carolina: 1 by 4.2. South Florida: 1 by 4.2. Memphis: 1 by 4.2. Tulsa: 1 by 14.2. UCF: 4 by 26.7. SMU: 5 by 70.8. Cincinnati: 4 by 16.7. UCF: 1 by 24.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1 · Games = 10 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 2 · -0.5 vs Wins
First Half0.3 · Games = 6 · -1.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1.5 · Games = 6 · +1.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs SMU
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/3 | vs UCF | W 45-28 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Cincinnati | W 27-24 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/18 | vs SMU2+ sacks · Splash game | W 59-24 | 5 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs UCF | L 31-38 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Tulsa | W 27-13 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Memphis | W 38-28 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ South Florida | W 45-31 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs East Carolina | W 24-9 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/30 | @ Houston | W 27-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Southern Miss | L 24-27 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Kansas State | W 17-10 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Massachusetts | W 42-10 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
201920202020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Postseason | Tulane | 6 | 16.3 | 2.8 | 6 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Tulane | 6 | 16.3 | 2.8 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Tulane | 22.5 | 35.6 | 11.9 | 16.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tulane | 11 | 18.6 | 8.8 | -11.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Tulane | 17 | 24.9 | 9.7 | 6 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 69.8 takeover score.
#2
UCF
4.5
Primary metric
Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 63.7 takeover score.
#3
Memphis
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61.5 takeover score.
#4
Florida Atlantic
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55 takeover score.
#5
Cincinnati
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Tulane
22.5 primary output · 35.6 efficiency · 11.9 usage
41.4
#2
2023 Regular Season · Tulane
28.5
17 primary · 24.9 efficiency · 9.7 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Tulane
21.8
6 primary · 16.3 efficiency · 2.8 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
8
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8167
Park Crossing · Montgomery, AL
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
105
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.