Usage Score
5.9
Player Dossier
2019-2023Wake Forest
Chelen Garnes
DB • 5'11" • 207 lbs • Waldorf, MD, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Chelen Garnes shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
28.3
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
14.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Wake Forest
1920212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Navy • Wake Forest
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chelen Garnes, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Wake Forest. Chelen Garnes shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Wake Forest paired 6 primary output with 22.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 28.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Navy, Wake Forest.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Wake Forest
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
28.3
Usage
5.9
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Syracuse
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Vanderbilt: 3. Old Dominion: 0. Georgia Tech: 0.5. Clemson: 0. Virginia Tech: 2. Pittsburgh: 0. Florida State: 1. Duke: 0. NC State: 2. Notre Dame: 0. Syracuse: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Vanderbilt: 7 by 59.2. Old Dominion: 3 by 12.5. Georgia Tech: 6 by 30. Clemson: 4 by 16.7. Virginia Tech: 8 by 53.3. Pittsburgh: 3 by 12.5. Florida State: 7 by 39.2. Duke: 6 by 25. NC State: 9 by 57.5. Notre Dame: 3 by 12.5. Syracuse: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1 · Games = 3 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 8 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · Games = 6 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.5 · Games = 6 · -0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
59.2 vs Vanderbilt
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ Syracuse | L 31-35 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Notre Dame | L 7-45 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs NC State | L 6-26 | 9 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/2 | @ Duke | L 21-24 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Florida State | L 16-41 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Pittsburgh | W 21-17 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Virginia Tech | L 13-30 | 8 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Clemson | L 12-17 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Georgia Tech | L 16-30 | 6 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Old Dominion | W 27-24 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Vanderbilt | W 36-20 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Navy
2019
Opening stop
- 2
Wake Forest
2020-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
20192020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Navy | 4 | 12.3 | 3.4 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | -4 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 6 | 22.8 | 6.7 | 6 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 6 | 27.6 | 4.8 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 8.5 | 28.3 | 5.9 | 2.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.8 takeover score.
#2
Syracuse
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.6 takeover score.
#3
Syracuse
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.3 takeover score.
#4
Tulsa
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
#5
Vanderbilt
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Wake Forest
6 primary output · 22.8 efficiency · 6.7 usage
21.8
#2
2019 Regular Season · Navy
19.6
4 primary · 12.3 efficiency · 3.4 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Wake Forest
14.5
8.5 primary · 28.3 efficiency · 5.9 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
150
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.