Usage Score
7
Player Dossier
2017-2021Coastal Carolina
Enock Makonzo
CB • 5'11" • 195 lbs • Lachine, PQ, Canada
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Enock Makonzo shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
29.2
Consistency
52.1
Season Value
25.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Coastal Carolina
17181920202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Coastal Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Southern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Enock Makonzo, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Coastal Carolina. Enock Makonzo shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Coastal Carolina paired 1 primary output with 22.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 29.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Coastal Carolina
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
29.2
Usage
7
Consistency
52.1
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 1.5. Unknown: 0. Kansas: 2.5. Buffalo: 0. Massachusetts: 1. UL Monroe: 0. Arkansas State: 1. App State: 1. Troy: 0. Georgia Southern: 0. Georgia State: 0.5. Texas State: 1. South Alabama: 1.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 10 by 56.7. Unknown: 5 by 20.8. Kansas: 6 by 50. Buffalo: 9 by 37.5. Massachusetts: 4 by 26.7. UL Monroe: 2 by 8.3. Arkansas State: 4 by 26.7. App State: 2 by 18.3. Troy: 11 by 45.8. Georgia Southern: 1 by 4.2. Georgia State: 4 by 21.7. Texas State: 4 by 26.7. South Alabama: 5 by 35.8
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=10 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · n=2 · -0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · n=6 · -0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kansas
Best efficiency game
56.7 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/17 | vs Northern Illinois10+ tackles | W 47-41 | 10 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/26 | @ South Alabama | W 27-21 | 5 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Texas State | W 35-21 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Georgia State | L 40-42 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Georgia Southern | W 28-8 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/28 | vs Troy10+ tackles | W 35-28 | 11 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 10/20 | @ App State | L 27-30 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 10/7 | @ Arkansas State | W 52-20 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs UL Monroe | W 59-6 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Massachusetts | W 53-3 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Buffalo | W 28-25 | 9 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/10 | vs KansasSplash game | W 49-22 | 6 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Coastal Carolina
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201820192020202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Coastal Carolina | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Coastal Carolina | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Coastal Carolina | 1 | 22.5 | 9.3 | 1 |
| 2020 Postseason | Coastal Carolina | 12.5 | 36.8 | 11.2 | 11.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Coastal Carolina | 12.5 | 36.8 | 11.2 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Coastal Carolina | 10 | 29.2 | 7 | -2.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Coastal Carolina | 10 | 29.2 | 7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia Southern
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 63.3 takeover score.
#2
Kansas
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.9 takeover score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.9 takeover score.
#4
Northern Illinois
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 43.6 takeover score.
#5
Kansas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 37.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Coastal Carolina
1 primary output · 22.5 efficiency · 9.3 usage
33.3
#2
2020 Postseason · Coastal Carolina
26.8
12.5 primary · 36.8 efficiency · 11.2 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Coastal Carolina
26.8
12.5 primary · 36.8 efficiency · 11.2 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
146
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.