Usage Score
23.2
Player Dossier
2019-2023Georgia Southern
Khaleb Hood
WR • 5'10" • 180 lbs • Mcdonough, GA, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Khaleb Hood reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71
Consistency
71.2
Season Value
65.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Georgia Southern
1920202122222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Georgia Southern
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Khaleb Hood, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Georgia Southern. Khaleb Hood reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Georgia Southern paired 948 primary output with 61.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: James Madison
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Georgia Southern
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
70.7
Efficiency
71
Usage
23.2
Consistency
71.2
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 29. Unknown: 88. Nebraska: 82. UAB: 38. Ball State: 39. Coastal Carolina: 62. Georgia State: 120. James Madison: 131. Old Dominion: 47. South Alabama: 76. Louisiana: 68. Marshall: 40. App State: 99
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Buffalo: 7 by 27.6. Unknown: 6 by 97.8. Nebraska: 6 by 91.1. UAB: 7 by 36.2. Ball State: 4 by 65. Coastal Carolina: 4 by 100. Georgia State: 11 by 72.7. James Madison: 8 by 100. Old Dominion: 7 by 44.8. South Alabama: 7 by 72.4. Louisiana: 6 by 75.6. Marshall: 4 by 66.7. App State: 9 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins79.6 · n=5 · +17.7 vs Losses
Losses61.9 · n=7 · -17.7 vs Wins
First Half65.4 · n=7 · -11.4 vs Second Half
Second Half76.8 · n=6 · +11.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
James Madison
Best efficiency game
100 vs James Madison
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | @ Buffalo | L 21-23 | — | 7 | 29 | 4.1 | 4.10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs App StateHigh volume | W 51-48 | — | 9 | 99 | 10.3 | 11 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Marshall | L 10-23 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 27 |
| Fri 11/11 | @ Louisiana | L 17-36 | — | 6 | 68 | 8.9 | 11.30 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs South Alabama | L 31-38 | — | 7 | 76 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Old Dominion | W 28-23 | — | 7 | 47 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs James Madison100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-38 | — | 8 | 131 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Georgia State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 33-41 | — | 11 | 120 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 30-34 | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Ball State | W 34-23 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ UAB | L 21-35 | — | 7 | 38 | 5.4 | 5.40 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Nebraska | W 45-42 | — | 6 | 82 | 13 | 13.70 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 88 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 46 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia Southern
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
20192020202020212022202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 95 | 63.3 | 20.4 | — |
| 2020 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 224 | 64 | 21.4 | 129 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 224 | 64 | 21.4 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 497 | 77.3 | 32.6 | 273 |
| 2022 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 919 | 71 | 23.2 | 422 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 919 | 71 | 23.2 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 948 | 61.3 | 28 | 29 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 948 | 61.3 | 28 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107
Primary metric
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
James Madison
131
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Minnesota
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Coastal Carolina
131
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 72.8 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Georgia Southern
948 primary output · 61.3 efficiency · 28 usage
66
#2
2023 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
66
948 primary · 61.3 efficiency · 28 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Georgia Southern
65.7
919 primary · 71 efficiency · 23.2 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
9
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,683
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 59 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.