Usage Score
22.1
Player Dossier
2019-2022East Carolina
C.J. Johnson
WR • 6'2" • 222 lbs • Greenville, NC, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
C.J. Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83
Consistency
54.1
Season Value
63.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · East Carolina
1920212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- East Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
C.J. Johnson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · East Carolina. C.J. Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
East Carolina paired 1,016 primary output with 86.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 83 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · East Carolina
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
82.5
Efficiency
83
Usage
22.1
Consistency
54.1
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. NC State: 11. Unknown: 13. Navy: 17. Unknown: 46. Old Dominion: 21. Temple: 100. UCF: 106. South Florida: 85. Cincinnati: 283. UConn: 85. Tulsa: 141
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. NC State: 2 by 36.7. Unknown: 1 by 86.7. Navy: 2 by 56.7. Unknown: 5 by 61.3. Old Dominion: 1 by 100. Temple: 8 by 83.3. UCF: 8 by 88.3. South Florida: 5 by 100. Cincinnati: 12 by 100. UConn: 4 by 100. Tulsa: 6 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins53 · Games = 2 · -53.1 vs Losses
Losses106.1 · Games = 7 · +53.1 vs Wins
First Half34.7 · Games = 6 · -105.3 vs Second Half
Second Half140 · Games = 5 · +105.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Tulsa100 receiving yards | L 24-49 | — | 6 | 141 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ UConn | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 85 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Cincinnati100 receiving yards · High volume | L 43-46 | — | 12 | 283 | 23.6 | 23.60 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs South Florida | L 20-45 | — | 5 | 85 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ UCF100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-41 | — | 8 | 106 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Fri 10/4 | vs Temple100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-27 | — | 8 | 100 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Old Dominion | W 24-21 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Navy | L 10-42 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ NC State | L 6-34 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
East Carolina
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20192020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | East Carolina | 908 | 83 | 22.1 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | East Carolina | 405 | 84.1 | 12.6 | -503 |
| 2021 Regular Season | East Carolina | 520 | 78.8 | 16.3 | 115 |
| 2022 Postseason | East Carolina | 1,016 | 86.5 | 20.7 | 496 |
| 2022 Regular Season | East Carolina | 1,016 | 86.5 | 20.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
283
Primary metric
283 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Florida
197
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
197 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
99
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
95
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
86
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · East Carolina
1,016 primary output · 86.5 efficiency · 20.7 usage
65.2
#2
2022 Regular Season · East Carolina
65.2
1,016 primary · 86.5 efficiency · 20.7 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · East Carolina
63.9
908 primary · 83 efficiency · 22.1 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,849
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.